Brock Lesnar

"The greatest athlete overall on the planet right up there besides Bo Jackson. He had so many talents and took to pro wrestling like a fish takes to water. Amazing wrestler with more personality than being given credit for by the masses. His later matches could be more dull but talent is recognized in him from countless angles. One of the last guys you'd wish or want to legitimately fight"

[9.0] "Brock Lesnar is one of those wrestlers who just felt like a natural from the moment he showed up. He had the size, strength, speed and athleticism to back up his look, and he was able to become a top guy pretty quickly. His first WWE run had some great moments, especially his matches with Kurt Angle and Undertaker and I think his ability to come across as a legit badass is a big reason why he has stayed so popular over the years."

[0.0] "genuinely my most hated wrestler before it was even revealed that he were a creep. never compelled by his early 2000's run, though some matches remained excellent, but his return in later years just. What the fuck, man? ! That's a goat? He is in the conversation for best ever? ! Do we hear ourselves? ! Watch ONE literally ANY ONE of those matches and you'll see how bad he fucks up when asked to orchestrate all his own. Dude has no mind for this game, technical prowess? Yeah man. Athletic? Far more than I"ll ever be, yeah man. But he isn't a good conductor. He isn't a good ring partner. He isn't a good promo. He killed Kofimania. He made the product unwatchable for years. Years. He maybe probably really hurt that woman man. I don't think I've ever given a 0 before but hell I had to reserve it for somebody. This hack can have it. Fucking zero, waste of a roster spot."

[4.0] "easily one of the most overrated wrestler aot, dude ruined wwe from 16-19 hogging the uni titles and somehow he gets an high rating during those years? i dont get it. and ive never liked the "new" lesnar either. the rating would be lower if his first run wasnt great, having all time fights with angle and the bunch, but man he is easily one of my least fav wrestlers ever him, reigns and goldberg were dreadfull back in their heiday no mention of that money in the bank either"

[9.0] "There's not much that needs to be said that isn't already said, Brock is his own category of wrestler. A super freak athlete who never lost his athleticism even into the later stages of his career. Headlined as the next big thing and for proper reason, so many men have tried to be the next Brock Lesnar and so many have failed. An 11 times world champion and 1 time UFC champion he was always credible as the top guy no matter what he did. Brock has instant classics for days, and although he was never prominent on the microphone, he was always great at making what he said sound real. You believed he was wrestling to kill every time he stepped in the ring. My only real complaint about Brock was his style got somewhat formulaic after 2016, but he was still able to churn out classics. One of the greats, who was a certified main eventer almost any way you put it, 9/10"

[10.0] "Was torn between a 9 and a 10, but have to go with a 10 for Brock Lesnar. He was a star from the very moment he debuted until he retired, there was never a point where he wasn't anything other than that. His real life credentials have made him even bigger than he was when he was initially in the WWE. He's a damn good wrestler, and his mic work did improve a lot compared to what it was like during the early 2000s. He's had legitimate classic matches throughout the years with all the top names. You couldn't really ask for anything more from a performer. He ended his career on a high by putting over Oba Femi and just going out quietly instead of making a bit spectacle out of it."

[6.0] "When Brock Lesnar is fully motivated and believes in his opponent and in the story they are trying to tell, he is more than capable of putting on a great match (for example The Undertaker, AJ Styles and Daniel Bryan) He is an extremely believable and physical powerhouse but he doesn't have the charisma and mic skills so he had Paul Heyman by his side for most of his career, which is a fantastic pairing."

[9.0] "Very smooth in the ring. He has an all timer intimidating look of a top guy. And his cowboy mic work isn't bad"

[6.0] "After an utterly remarkable start in the business, it didn't take long for him to become complacent, boring, & a person whose matches always broiled down to "slam slam slam I win lol." He was issued win after win after win throughout the tumultuous later 2010's days to the joy of nobody. He always needed Heyman because his mic work was never that great, which is a weird thing to need for someone this renouned and loved. I'd comment about the IRL troubles but this is a wrestling reviewing website and to even comment on them is against website rules anyway. He rocked in the early 2000's."

[1.0] "Bad wrestler, terrible talker, worse human being. He never gave a single flying fuck about pro wrestling. He never acted as a professional, rather it was backstage, or in the ring. He never did anything good for this business. Not a big surprise that he was considered (or still is, by some) a great wrestler by people backstage and fans of this disgusting company. I really don't understand how he can have such a high rating for how bad he was. People here has spiked the ratings (rightfully so) of wrestlers who did terrible things, but not him. Guess you guys are just fucking hypocrites. F that guy."

[7.0] "Recently, after looking back at this career Brock has been very overrated to me. Appears only for the main events and disappears for the rest of the year. I know he's supposed to be treated as a spectacle but c'mon. Atleast I am happy that he's been a regular for Raw which is rare these days. He's only living from the glory of the things he did earlier in his career."

[3.0] "Brock Lesnar is a completely "okay" wrestler in the ring, absolutely awful on the mic and absolutely awful in real life. He used to be really good in his first WWE run but then came back for seemingly no reason and was a plague upon the TV. 2015-2019 Lesnar was one of the worst eras of wrestlers ever, continuously burying talent because "he's strong". He was so close with Vince he may as well just be him."

[0.0] "This is a finisher spam wrestler. I don't have the hype or the memories of what he was, for me he is just a boring wrestler who can't even make his own promos. Every time I see someone mentioning how good one of his match was, it's just because his opponent was giving all they had to beat him. The proof is that his WM38 against Roman was boring because both wrestler spammed finisher, it's what you get when you do the only 3 moves that you know. I must add that despite spamming the same moves for 14 years now, he still manages to hurt his opponents while doing his moveset. I come now later to the realization that I forgot to mention how controversial his all round career was and that the Royal Rumble 2022 would've been way better without him. He stole so many spotlights for other better and more interesting matches, that I can't with all honesty put him any higher."

[9.0] "One of the all time greats and still going strong to this day. Has done a great job of putting over talent. One of the biggest stars in pro wrestling history."

[5.0] "Decent in the ring but every match ends before it really gets going. He has absolutely no stamina in the ring and cannot go a long match unless it's multi man so he can rest. He can't talk on the mic at all and has had Heyman to carry him in that aspect"

[4.0] "Lesnar is... complicated. As a worker, he's not just dumb muscle and does have a keen mind for what's worth working and what's not, but the problem is, is that he was so ingratiated with Vince (to the point of near-downfall with his involvement in the Janel Grant case; sorry, but "he isn't the one on trial" butters no parsnips when the text of the lawsuit alleges the fully intent to do serious wrongdoing on his part) that he often phoned it in regardless. This is especially evident in the later stages of his career, when the guarantee of a monster push regardless led to boring, cooker-cutter matches. But as much as I think of him as a worker, I absolutely despite what Lesnar has come to represent. He should never have come back after Vince's downfall. Because it stains the reputation of him, of Triple H, and of the WWE, and more than anything, he represents the heinous dumpster fire that is WWE corporate culture, and their belief that they can get away with anything."

[9.0] "Brock wasn't one of the most active wrestlers throughout his journey, and he only has 2-3 years of a truly full time career, but even though this is a disadvantage, he's awesome... one of the best at being dominant and just brutalizing his opponent, Brock is one of wrestling's most hypnotic attractions, and that's the way he was presented all the time, as a dominant and imposing superstar, a conqueror. Lesnar for sure have a pretty eye-catching physique, and he's a phenomenal athlete, the beast nickname is totally worth it because he's a freak, it's unreal how fast he moves and how privileged he is athletically. His performances almost always rely on strength and domination, and he's great at combining the factors of being simply one of the coolest wrestlers to watch brutalizing someone, like WALTER or Joe, and also at being a very special must-watch attraction, like Andre for example. His matches are very unique, specially after his return, where he became a prizefighter and brought a lot of MMA-based stuff into his arsenal, and several Brock matches feel real, like a real competition, because of the way he portrays himself. I love watching Brock and his matches, his best stuff is really good, but of course there are some inconsistencies, which is normal. The period outside of wrestling is a factor, but he definitely came back better, and had better matches. The first run is great, but he still wasn't fully there in terms of character work, and the babyface run is kinda weird, but overall his first tenure is a pretty cool run, that was unfortunately cut short. I see Lesnar as a guy that works well against big and small opponents, he's very versatile in this aspect, and he has great matches against totally different workers, which is again, something very positive."

[3.0] "Thank you Brock? For what? What has Brock Lesnar done in his pro-wrestling career to deserve this level of acclaim besides looking big and having a cool entrance theme? Sure, he had a strong rookie run in WWE, and then he had an all time stinker at Wrestlemania XX and left for the NFL. After a whopping three preseason games he went to Japan, sucked so bad he made shinsuke nakamura cry, and quite literally stole the IWGP heavyweight championship on his way out, then went to the UFC, and when he couldn't do that anymore he returned to WWE as a part timer. If youve been keeping score that means he spent a grand total of two years as an active full time wrestler. You could argue he's had some classics since returning, against CM Punk, Daniel Bryan and AJ Styles, but you'll find that the common denominator here is that these are three of the best wrestlers of all time. Everything else has been mediocre to outright bad, both booking and match quality wise. Half of the three matches he had on any given year were sub 5 minutes squashes, and the other were boring signature/finisher spams that usually got booed out of the arena. Not to mention his all time bad mic skills or, crucially, the several allegations levied against him which people like to pretend don't exist."

[2.0] "Yes. Thank you, Brock for...getting everything handed to you once you got out of OVW? Then left anyway because you don't know how contracts work? He had a nice run as a rookie and then left for 8 years. Since 2012 he's been part time with a good match here or there but after 2015 the good matches have been very few and far between. Since 2018 almost every match he's had was shit, including his last one. He actually bumps and sells really well but could never cut a promo for shit and the longer his career went, the worse his matches got. It became a 5 minutes or less finisher spam which meant seeing him and his opponent do the same two or three moves and kicking out of them. You know what that is? That's lazy."

[1.0] "Despite possessing all the qualities to be the greatest of all time, it was all sadly wasted from his lazy and repetitive moveset. He is mostly disengaged and unwilling to elevate the match to give a good show for the fans. His repeated part-time championship reigns devalued the credibility of the championship titles he held, treating championship belts as accessories to make him look good rather than symbols of credible excellence and competition. He will always be remembered as a detrimental figure who damaged the prestige of titles and the overall product quality, embodying the worst aspects of part-time stardom and selective effort over consistent contribution to the wrestling business. His legacy will be remembered as one of squandered potential and self-serving dominance that prioritizes money over entertainment."

[2.0] "All he has is his look. This man has brought shame to professional wrestling ever since his first departure from WWE (after that WM stinker) Brought shame to NJPW, won gold in the UFC just to lose it right back, goes back to WWE, wrestles 5 matches a year (95% of them bad besides his matches with AJ, Danielson, Punk, and triple threat with Rollins and Cena) All he does is spam the same suplexes, there's nothing wrong with having a small moveset as long as you have the psychology to go along with it but he just doesn't, he does NOT have good matches unless he is getting carried. How dare he break the undertaker streak? What a dumb move, this man was overbooked by Vince because he was juiced up and was (allegedly) doing some strange things with him too. Terrible wrestler."

[9.0] "Undoubtedly one of the greatest professional wrestlers of all time. Everytime you heard this man's music, you know shit is gonna go down. If he is truly retired after 'Mania, then he had an incredible career. Thank you, Brock. Thank you for creating these unforgettable moments over your 26-year wrestling career."

[9.0] "Brock Lesnar has had an incredible career. His rise in 2002 was something special. WWE strapping a rocket to a guy that young and actually pulling it off. He immediately felt like a huge star. The look, the presence, the athleticism. Everything was there. For a big man, his offense was insane, and he could actually sell and move in a way most guys his size never could. His 02-04 run is one of my personal favorites. So many great matches, and it really sucked seeing him burn out and leave the business so early. When he came back in 2012, he completely reinvented his style, and to his credit, it worked. He leaned into the aura, the dominance, and became a legitimate attraction. He was a massive draw and always felt like a big deal whenever he showed up. That said, from around 2015 onward, his matches started to feel way too formulaic. Just suplex spam and F5 spam over and over. It was over, but it got repetitive. Promos were never his strong point, but they were serviceable, and pairing him with Paul Heyman obviously helped elevate everything. Unfortunately, the Vince McMahon Janel Grant lawsuit connection does cast a shadow over things and leaves a stain on an otherwise excellent career."

[9.0] "This bastard was a mountain of muscle, and he could also do a Shooting Star Press and do giant jumps. I'll always have a special place for Brock Lesnar in my heart. I haven't always been able to appreciate his work (especially when he was a part-time champion), but now I can appreciate all the good things he did. The first time I saw Brock was in 2015, and I enjoyed watching him come in and destroy Seth Rollins and The Authority (where Seth was my N°1 enemy). Brock always faced the best of the best in every era he was in: Triple H, Kurt Angle, John Cena, Seth Rollins, Randy Orton, Roman Reigns, The Undertaker, CM Punk, and I could go on all day. Thank you so much for everything, Brock <3."

[7.0] "I feel that Brock Lesnar is overrated by a lot of people, He just isn't charismatic and his matches are hit or miss, He is kinda like a modern Goldberg without the "YOUR NEXT! " Schtick, I like Brock, But he is usually involved in Squash matches, And I am not a fan of squash matches, He also gets the WWE Title too much, And ruins a lot of people's pushes, Including Kofi Kingston and Big E, I just feel he is somewhat overrated. WRESTLEMANIA 42 EDIT: Thank you for the memories Brock Lesnar, You may not be my cup of tea, But you are one of the best"

[10.0] "The greatest to ever do it. If this is truly the end of his in-ring career, Thank You Brock. He got me through alot of tough times when I was younger. Watching him on my screen obliterate everyone was so awe-inspiring for my younger self, and he was actually the person who got me into WWE in the first place. He'll be missed."

[5.0] "In the past, Brock Lesnar certainly had a case for being a great wrestler. But nowadays, Brock Lesnar is a 3 trick pony. German Suplex, Kimura Lock, F5. Combined with the fact that he rarely shows up to work, Lesnar isn't as good anymore."

[7.0] "a tremendous athlete, a clearly skilled pro-wrestler but for some reason, it just doesn't do it for me, even his matches with Kurt Angle leave me going "okay""

"Lesnar should've retired a long time ago, what's the point of him staying active? He has been a part-timer for so long, at least for a decade, he shouldn't even have come back to wwe in the first place. Oh, and he's a terrible person as well."

[8.0] "I think maybe 10-year-old me would have said 10, but I think 13-year-old me would have said 0. Nothing bothered me more as a kid than somebody who had the title and was never around. I wanted to see that thing defended all the time, and watching Brock win it over and over with Roman, and that thing sitting in limbo drove me nuts. That's why I detest that stupid universal title so much. In terms of skill, Brock always looked like a monster in the ring. Every time he gave an f5 you just wanted to wince because they all look like they hurt so bad. He was always prone to pretty decent feuds, and most of the time I was happier than mad to see him on TV, but then I would realize wait a minute he's not coming back for months, is he? That's literally my only complaint, he shows up for title matches, like he would show up for like 2-3 shows before a PLE and then win the title and then wash, rinse, repeat."

[6.0] "Whenever I am in some form of wrestling environment, talks about how great Brock is are always present, and I fail to see why. His outside the ring performance is terrible, always in desperate need of being carried by others. And his in-ring skills are marginally ahead of that. Suplex here, F5 there, here's your victory, see you in three months. The few matches of him that I've enjoyed, much like his promo work, was heavily carried by his opponent(s). Overrated doesn't even begin to describe his work beyond his first couple of years in WWE. That last part is what bumps him up for me."

[9.0] "Brock Lesnar misses out on a point due to his inconsistency but even then I kinda get it: he's the Bruiser Brody of this century. He knows what his time is worth and when he should hold back in a match. I've long held that Brock Lesnar is the barometer of the WWE - the amount of effort that Brock Lesnar is willing to put into a match with someone is a measurement of their objective worth as a performer. Lesnar is an outstanding power wrestler with a great look and legitimate skills. He is also one of the best sellers of his generation, a fact that shockingly does not get remarked upon often enough."

[10.0] "When motivated he's a fantastic worker. Has a style unique to himself, especially in todays environment when everyone loves flips and dives. He's just out there throwing people around. Is not and never has been a promo guy, but it works for him as a monster heel. Honestly he shouldn't say much. Has an aura of invincibility that makes his opponent seem like their in peril when they step in the ring with him. Actually a very good seller when he feels it makes sense and has a good psychology in the ring. May not love the sport, but he's damn good at it."

[9.0] "I get it. Brock is not for everyone.He will resonate a lot more with people who appreciates the art of combat and martial arts in general, rather than the type of people who watch wrestling for promos, flips and outfits. He's totally unique in the sense that he could actually beat the absolute shit out of anyone he is in the ring with. For many wrestlers, that is not the case."

[7.0] "I have no interested in watching him in 2026 for multiple reasons but i can't ignore what he's done in his career. I can't deny that he's one of a kind and his overall run(s) in the WWE are pretty good. A bit overrated tho."

[6.0] "Way overrated. His original run in WWE was good, but since his return in 2012, he has only had a handful of good matches and moments, and he was carried to those. Far more boring bs than not. Boring character"

[2.0] "There are two prevailing camps of opinions regarding Brock Lesnar: (1) his legacy and aura in the WWE is too unforgettable to disregard, and (2) his personal controversies and overly-graceful booking makes him too unlikable. As a casual fan, I was in group 1, but as I've learned more about Brock Lesnar's controversies both inside and outside the ring, I'm more inclined to be in group 2. He obviously has a lot of legendary moments, and arguably some legendary matches too. I think a lot of it gets soured when you think about how much his booking got in the way of the quality of the WWE product, especially in the late 2010's. I also just don't think his in-ring work and character work is good enough to clear the stink of his controversies."

[0.0] "Modern day Brock Lesnar is one of the worst parts about WWE. He has zero respect for the business and does it for the paycheck. He did nothing in 2025 except. a couple of suplexes and F-5's. He gave Cena his worst feud and match of the year, and hurt the royal rumble match by no selling what should be brutal chops. He's constantly in the main event and refuses to put over people that he doesn't think is a 10/10. WWE needs to stop relying on him and build new stars. WrestlePalooza exposed him big time when he looked tired after literally squashing Cena in 8 minutes. It's a terrible look for him."

[4.0] "My previous rating of Brock Lesnar who's by the way one of my favorite wrestlers growing up was actually an eight. But the man hasn't been good in a long time and he looked sloppy in Royal Rumble last night. He is a beast for a reason so his character is believable. His mic skills are not so bad but kinda basic. Even with his old age I believe he can still deliver he just has to care enough to do so"

[0.0] "One of the single most overrated performers and up there as one of the worst human beings in the history of wrestling. Let's just put it this way, look up the number of performers Brock has injured. It's practically everyone he's ever worked with. He broke Kurt Angle's neck multiple times, he concussed The Undertaker, the list literally goes on and on. And why? Because Brock is a dangerous worker who cares nothing for his fellow performer or for wrestling, so he is perpetually rusty because he never works matches unless he's getting a multi-million dollar pay day to main event a PPV. When he does wrestle, it can be said that having 5 moves of doom would be an upgrade for Lesnar. He barely scratches 2. German suplex, German Suplex, F-5, F-5, pin, 1-2-3 and people somehow cheer for this embarrassment. His matches can barely be called matches. What about his title reigns? They are even more of a joke. They could more accurately be called title hostage situations. If Brock wins the world title, kiss that baby goodbye for at least 6 months. If that isn't bad enough, Brock is a complete and utter charisma vacuum. He can't talk, or more accurately he doesn't want to because again, he doesn't care. He just stands there and has someone else do the talking for him. Without Paul Heyman Lesnar would be a -1 instead of a 0. People say Lesnar has a great look. Well after 20 years of having the same look, it's old so not even that inspires any sort of emotion. Simply put Lesnar is a cancer upon wrestling who has only taken and never given a single thing back to the art form, unless handing out concussions and broken bones counts as giving back. Oh, and did I mention the man is credibly accused of sex trafficking? So everything negative I said about him as a performer goes double for him as a human being. WWE should have completely cut ties with him, but it says a lot about their leadership and company culture that they still drag this scumbag hack out to do the same tired crap and think nothing of it."

[5.0] "This man is literally the definition of just phoning it in whenever he doesn't feel like working. Brock can be good when he actually wants to work, but that's rare these days, now it's just doing suplexes, F5s, leaves, collects paychecks and dissappears. Like I said, Brock does have good match and has had great segments, but he's title reigns from 2017 - 2022 were the worst and a prime example of why part-time wrestlers should never be champions."

[3.0] "ENGAGER: 6 (crap-eating grin and reactions to opponents were strong even if he was inconsistent with selling) STRIKER: 8 (impactful but often repetitive or boring) CRAFTMASTER: 5 (His early run was strong, but his post-UFC stuff was very limited and repetitive0 AERIALIST: 1 (Shooting Star Press at Mania was impressive even though he landed on his head/neck) POWERHOUSE: 10 (All-timer in terms of power displays, and he showed more creativity in his first run) EXTREMIST: 7 (Held his own with extreme spots and extreme rules matches) ENTRANCE: 7 NARRATIVE: 1 GIMMICK: 2 (Cowboy Brock had some creativity. Normally, he was a very boring character). ANGLE: 6 GRUDGE: 3 (Most of his feuds got to the point of channel-change interest) ELOCUTION: 1 (One of the worst speakers to ever be a consistent WrestleMania main event act) That would really be a score of 47.5%, but you have to account for his overall impact and influence, which drops him down to a 3. I truly believe professional wrestling would have been better off if he never got involved in it. His selfishness in his matches and storylines and feuds served to mostly to keep himself over, and he was very poor at creating new stars or elevating opponents. All of that taken into context, and then you consider his involvement with the scummy sex offender Vince McMahon, and his anti-LGBT views and comments shared in national media outlets in the past, and a 3/10 might be very generous. Brock Lesnar has been a poison for wrestling. His greatest value for me was watching him get squashed by Goldberg at Survivor Series 2016."

[4.0] "I honestly don't understand the hype around Brock at all. To me, he's massively overrated, weirdly booked, and responsible for some of the most boring championship reigns in modern wrestling. His entire presentation feels one-dimensional: show up rarely, destroy someone in a few minutes, disappear for months, then repeat. I genuinely don't see what he brings to the table in the big 2026. How is he even still employed..."

[8.0] "If this rating from pre-2016 I think it'd be fair to give Brock the full-10 for how unnaturally athletic and strong he is, but unfortunately while I enjoy his work, his in-ring ethic has gotten extremely lazy with his move set nowadays comprising of pretty much only f5s and suplexes. Nevertheless, while his wrestling style is extremely basic he does manage to continue to be entertaining at times and when motivated and evidently enjoying himself is pretty fun to watch."

[9.0] ""I have a hard time rating characters like this because he played his role perfectly. He couldn't have done it any better, and for that alone, he deserves a 10. But do his in-ring skills justify such a grade? Then again, should we even demand acrobatics and technical wrestling from this type of character?"

[10.0] "The most legitimate monster in the history of WWE. Every time his music hits you know whoever he is targeting is in jeopardy. He brings an air of realism to wrestling that is sorely missed in the current era."

[4.0] "If we're talking about 2002-2003 Brock Lesnar, this is like a 9/10. He did so much good stuff during that time on Smackdown that was must-watch. That being said, he has been insufferable to watch for over a decade now, not even factoring in the lawsuit he's currently a part of. The entire 4 points he gets comes from his early 2000s run and not the trash he's pumped out since. I still can't believe the amount that WWE commits to this guy."

[5.0] "He's not really a proper wrestler in my eyes, never felt he cared about the business only the money. Once upon a time i would say he was good "beast" but there's guys working in the company today way better then him. His movest is too limited to be enjoyable to me as a fan"

[9.0] "Brock is an interesting character to evaluate. Obviously recently controversies linger over him, but I'm more interested in evaluating the wrestler in this instance. Arguably the freakiest athlete to ever step foot in a wrestling ring, he was box office the minute he showed up. Massive and explosive in his 6'3" 290 pound frame with an NCAA wrestling background to build on, there's no one like him, let alone that can move like him. His early career is fantastic, and sometimes I wish we could've seen what would have happened had he not gone to UFC. The 60-minute Ironman with Kurt Angle is an all timer and maybe the best Smackdown match of all time. His finisher is pretty unique, and one of my favorites. Upon his return from UFC, he was booked as an absolute monster. His part time nature as champion bothered a lot of people and I get that. Some of the squashes he was booked in and the way they were sequenced could admittedly be boring. But during that run we saw what could happen if someone pushed him to be great in a match. He has great work with Styles, Rollins, Cena, Roman, Danielson (Daniel Bryan), and Punk during that run which showed how capable he always has been when given the space to perform and not just smash things. Undoubtedly one of the best of his generation. Hoping his final run here allows him to put some guys like Gunther, Bron Breakker, Oba Femi, Bronson Reed, and/or Jacob Fatu over while hopefully having enough left in the tank to make those matches good."

[8.0] "I understand that his rating is going to be heavily influenced by his recent controversy however as a wrestler he is good, he has always been argumatively underrated and very underrated on selling. It was always smart to give him Paul Heyman as a mouthpiece as his promos were nearly as worse as Ricochet. You may like him or hate him but when that theme plays the crowd absolutely love it - always good crowd interaction."