[5.0] "This event had two good encounters, a lot of very average matches and some pretty bad encounters too."

[7.0] "Honestly I really enjoyed most of this card. I think the undercard was at times enjoyable, although the Watts/Raven and Hardy/Hall matches are unwatchable garbage. Outside of that, I really enjoyed multiple matches on the undercard, primarily the Skipper/Dutt match. Once we got to the main event matches, the tag title match and Ultimate X matches were amazing. Really good examples of what put TNA on the map in their early years of shifting from weekly PPV to monthly shows/weekly TV. Those two matches are two early TNA classics, highly recommended. Overall it was a really good show, even through a bad three matches in the middle. Kudos to the crowd here, who popped constantly and never calmed down. They added to the quality of this show!"

[6.0] "Mixed bag of a PPV. The tag title match and the Ultimate X were really good. On the other hand Scott Hall vs Jeff Hardy and the triple threat were quite shit. I enjoyed Rhodes vs Kid Kash, and the main event was alright but the wrong winner in my opinion. Overall, a serviceable show."

[7.0] "First up, props to the crowd who were super loud and enthusiastic throughout, they make such a difference. If you watch from the moment that Nash gets eliminated from the three way then you are going to have a very good time. The undercard is all perfectly fine except the Hall/Hardy match but that goes barely 5 minutes."

[9.0] "A very good show from TNA, at the time their best monthly PPV of the three in my opinion and arguably their best show overall up to this point. The tag title and X-title match are among the best one-two punches of matches in company history. The Ultimate X especially is an all time great TNA match, one I hold in higher regard than Unbreakable. The tag title match is a very underrated gem that was a great mesh up of old and new styles. The opener was solid, Sonjay and Skipper had a good undercard match as did Dustin Rhodes and Kid Kash. Watts/Raven and Hall/Hardy were the two lowlight matches of the show while the main other blemish on the show was the result of the main event (which was at least a solid match until that result.) Still a very enjoyable show and one of TNA? s stronger efforts. 8.5 but I? ll bump to a 9."

[6.0] "A decent enough event with a few very good matches. Most notably, the AJ-Sabin-Petey Ultimate X match was classic X-Division action at its best. The AMW-Team Canada match and the Jarrett-Brown match were both good, though both were very overbooked. Elsewhere, the Kid Kash-Dustin Rhodes match was better than you'd expect, and succeeded in making the difficult big face vs. small heel dynamic work; the opener was a fun enough 6-man and it was kinda neat to see Daniels and Kazarian team up years before officially forming Bad Influence (Kaz' partner was Michael Shane at this time); and for whatever it's worth, Raven gave Erik Watts probably his career-best match."

[8.0] "This was a very good show. The main two matches to look out for are the tag team title match and the Ultimate X match which are both classics. Then there is a very good match with Elix Skipper and Sonjay Dutt. And some enjoyable matches with the opening six man tag match and the main event. Even some of the not so good matches can be enjoyable if you watch with an open mind. Overall this is a good one."

[7.0] "Finally a good monthly event for TNA. Extra-ring there was nothing interesting, build-up videos and other stuff. There were two really great matches, the Tag Team Championships (4 stars and 1/2) and the Ultimate-X match for the X-Division Championship (5 stars). Monty Brown was tired at the time of the main event and the continued bump referees annoyed me, maybe because they did something similar in the tag team match but it had a better end. The majority of matches are boring, so I can't give more than 7 points, but it's better than the two 2004 monthly events."