WCW World Six Man Tag Team Championship

[3.0] "To make a trios division work you need trios. These teams were more about just putting wrestlers together to go after the titles outside of the Freebirds. Not the worst title but not the best"

[3.0] "WCW didn't have the trios teams available to make these belts work, most teams were mashings of different wrestlers who don't really have anything to do, it's a nice thought but there's no chemistry between most of them. I like the belt designs, not over the top but maybe a little simple."

[1.0] "Terribly carried-booked title. There weren't many 3-man teams to begin with. Only the first reign was OK and I liked the team. Even WCW soon realised it was a total failure, so they decided to give it up."

[1.0] "Trios titles can certainly be fun when done right, but at the time these were introduced WCW just didn't have a ready supply of dedicated trio factions (with the sole exception of the then-current version of the Freebirds). Aside from the Freebirds and the York Foundation, the belts were competed for and held mainly by random combinations of wrestlers during their brief history, and really just never needed to exist in the first place."

[4.0] "I do think these titles had potential, but as one of the previous users below me said, they were created at a time when WCW didn't have a good roster of trios. I feel as if these were introduced later, they could have been big. Nonetheless, a 4."