WWE Women's Championship

[6.0] "Belts been in a bad way for a while, but the lineage in undeniable as some of the industrys absolute best put in stellar work to solidify its place in the main event. Wait, in the main event? Yeah, even if modern times don't represent it, this belt was once as big a deal as any world title and deservedly so. I am hopeful it can gain back such prestige because the women employed under WWE deserve for it to be."

[2.0] "For all intents and purposes, this championship and the Women's World Championship are effectively worthless in TKO's WWE. Three times. That's how often this belt has been defended in 2026. I don't even know how that is possible for a major world championship, and yet here we are. And if that's not bad enough, all three of those contests involved Jade Cargill who isn't someone who should be sniffing a world championship match with her level of in ring ability what it is. Under TKO, the wrestling, which admittedly in WWE always took a back seat to presentation and flash, doesn't matter at all. Especially women's wrestling. Having women like Jade and Liv hold World Championships for hundreds of days and never once defend them is disgraceful. It's sad because at one time these titles actually mattered and were held by great wrestlers like Mercedes, and defended in great matches. Now they are worthless trinkets that Nick Khan and Ari Emanuel treat as afterthoughts."

[3.0] "For as good of a title as this once was, and for as good of the talent that wield this championship belt, I've accepted that WWE just doesn't know how to book female champions properly on the main roster. From refusing to take the title off of Rhea Ripley with a slightly torn meniscus, to Jade Cargill's 100 days without a title defense, to Tiffy's nonstop rematches with the same opponents, the title reigns have just been not good at all."

[10.0] "This championship is amazing and was a real important step in the womens revolution in 2016 when it debuted at WrestleMania 32 since then its had classic matches since its beginning and this title also has been apart of great rivalries such as Becky Lynch vs Bianca Belair when it was known as the RAW Womens Championship it was AMAZING and when it went back to being the WWE Womens Championship i loved bayley vs iyo and loved Bayley's second reign and match with Meiko Satomura in japan 10/10 championship"

[8.0] "Jade Cargill literally killed this title, but overall, this title was always great and you just can't give the title a bad rating based on one holder"

[10.0] "There is no reason to give this title a rating other than 10, it is literally one of the most famous titles in the world of women's wrestling, the design, for the old look (Raw Women's Championship), honestly was mid, and the actual design is definitely better than the old one"

[10.0] "Amazing lineage of champions, besides a couple. (Ronda, Nikki ASH) Ever since this was transitioned to the WWE Women's Championship, the lineage has been amazing. This is definitely a more prestigious championship than the Women's World Championship."

[7.0] "Compared to the Smackdown/Women's World Championship, this title is definitely better historically speaking. Having Charlotte be the first champion made sense as she was very dominant in the mid-2010s Women's era. The ups? Becky Lynch's crowning moment at WrestleMania, the dominance of Asuka; great champions like Iyo Sky, Bianca Belair, and Bayley. Of course there are downs, like the 'This is your life' segment that destroyed Bayley's momentum for several years, the constant hot potato in 2016 between Charlotte and Sasha, and Nia Jax's first (NOT second) title reign. Overall, a very good title with a great history, though there are champions that stick out like a sore thumb (looking at Nikki ASH in this regard)."

[8.0] "Out of all the womens titles on the main roster, this is the most respected in terms of booking, but that doesnt mean much."

[8.0] "This belt has been treated well since it was introduced ending the Diva's era in WWE. Most of the champions have been very talented wrestlers and had interesting reigns. A prize that means something to the women on the roster."

[4.0] "I am not a fan of this title whatsoever; it just seems like a thank-you prize. I really don't have much to say about this title, but they really need to work on an interesting storyline for it instead of random useless defences that have no build, or if they do, just a really weak match."

[7.0] "Probably the best booked women's title the WWE has ever had...although admittedly that doesnt mean much. This really is the main womens championship in WWE and just reinforces my belief that WWE should merge the 2 womens belts and focus more on the womens tag belts or add a Mid-Card title. Women in WWE dont have alot to do other than challenge for a world championship atm which dilutes the pool of challengers for this title, there's no way in my mind that women like Zelina Vega, Lana or Lacey Evans should ever have gotten near this belt."

[7.0] "this title has got some high highs and low lows. its been VERY inconsistent but its had a good streak of champions as of late. Bianca has added a lot of prestige back to the belt and i'm guessing Bayley's winning it next. let's see if this continues."

[7.0] "This title can range from phenomenal in its best to abysmal in its worst... It's a very inconsistent title. The most recent reigns have it trending down, but with this title it might spike up in quality out of nowhere."

[4.0] "The title is becoming a joke more and more, Charlotte being champion 6 times and 2 in the same years, the last two previous queens were bad because of the bookeo, when Asuka had the title she never defended it. The title needs a change. (act) After the draft and what happened in the Smackdown segment, the titles were seen as a worthless toy as something that can be changed just like that, a very bad decision that hurts the title."

[5.0] "Quite overrated title. The only good thing about it was Ronda's reign. Don't tell me you actually enjoyed Sasha and Charlotte's hot potatoing the title? Or Alexa burrying Bayley? Or Alexa Bullying Nia? Or Becky's reign of terror? Or Asuka's irrelevant reign?"

[6.0] "This title with the white on red design reminded me of candy, especially the red parts it looks like I can take a bite and it would break like rock candy. As for the quality of the matches have been fun but the beginning the belt felt like it was changing hands every two weeks, it's better now but damn that was ruff."

[8.0] "Not a bad championship. Lots of good matches like Charlotte vs Sasha, Becky vs Sasha, Alexa vs Mickie, and Becky vs Natalya. Compared to the SD Women's Championship, it has been booked far better and stronger. The only downside is the horrible of booking for both of Asuka's reigns and how it always manages to get entangled with the Women's Tag Team championships."

[10.0] "I'm not a fan of female wrestling but the work of the four horsewomen until Asuka is the best never had in this promotion. So I give to this title a 10 rate."

[6.0] "These days the title looks to be used better but the early back and forth between Charlotte and Banks really hurt this belt's initial perception."

[4.0] "Die ständigen Titelwechsel zwischen Charlotte Flair und Sasha Banks haben dem Titel anfangs geschadet. Seitdem Alexa Bliss Championesse ist, hat sie den Titel etwas aufgewertet. Mal sehen, wie sich der Titel nach Bliss Titelverslust entwickelt."

[6.0] "The belt has had some rough spots since it's inception, most noteably Sasha Bank's inability to defend it. That has seemed to settle down when Bliss got the title. Belt looks good."

[5.0] "This title is poorly booked and seems that the writers don't give a fuck about it, only take the example of Alexa Bliss defending her title on the last October and until January nothing and when it happens to be defended it's only Sasha Banks, Bayley, Alexa Bliss or sometimes Nia Jax on live events, the only thing that saves it it's the matches who aren't that bad."

[2.0] "Slightly better than SD's, but wasn't any good, too. Last year, i would give this 7. I understood that trading title back and forth was not a good idea at all. However, at least the title felt important, 4 title matches on raw (3 sasha/charlotte matches and bayley/charlotte ) were all excellent, drew great reactions from the crowds. Now this title is trash. Alexa lesnar's reign of terror is dreadful. Boring matches, uninteresting promos that bury anyone in the division. Awful storylines as well. 2 points for what happened before the shake up."

[2.0] "This title has just been absolutely awfully booked. It starts off from where Charlotte's Divas Championship left off, and while Charlotte is a good heel she didn't have any interesting partners to work off of then and she certainly didn't work well with Sasha either. They had the women have their "firsts" like the first PPV main event and the first women's Hell in a Cell, but then no title win felt important because they booked the changes so frequently and randomly. Bayley is in the background the whole time, and FINALLY wins the title, but then loses it after a month. Then enters Alexa, who is an even better heel than Charlotte, but with perhaps even worse matches. Her promo work is great, and she's a genuinely entertaining character to watch each week, but she doesn't make for exciting work in the ring. And then Sasha enters the scene again, seemingly at random, and just as quickly does she drop it back to Alexa. The title has been totally desecrated in attempt at making interesting storylines, but WWE hasn't realised that you need a respected title to build interesting storylines off of in the first place. Right now it feels like WWE just wants to do 'gotchas' as a cheap attempt to keep the fans on their feet, as if saying "you better watch our boring weekly show, and our house shows, and our dark matches, and ALL our ppvs, or else you might miss something BIG! ", but that ends up being way too forced, and now the title means nothing."

[3.0] "Hot potato-ing the championship between two people does not a good title lineage make. As much as Sasha and Charlotte Flair are fine to hold the belts, it takes all relevance out of the championship if it's so hard to keep track of who has it! In an ideal world, a heel champion would take hold of this - Awesome Kong would be perfect. And have a long reign, ended by whoever is the most over babyface. Until that happens, this title isn't what's important, and Charlotte's PPV winning streak is completely pointless if she has to keep winning the belt as she lost it between shows."

[8.0] "The Women's Title Matches are good but is only for four women on the roster. This title suffers a lot with the title changes on "every RAW and PPV" but, I'll say again, the matches are very good."

[9.0] "You can argue it's been predictable but Sasha and Charlotte's back and forth for the title in great matches has made them feel equal competitors and given the championship matches higher stakes. Hopefully if the plan is for Charlotte to drop the title to Bayley she stays out of the picture for a while, though."

[8.0] "Sure I'd prefer Sasha to have had longer reigns and more defenses and maybe Charlotte has been a little too central for a little too long (when you treat this as a continuation of the Diva's title) but these are excellent matches from excellent wrestlers. If you can't forgive Sasha and Charlotte for trading the title back and forth but have no issue with The Rock and Mankind or Benoit and Jericho trading titles back and forth then I can't understand your perspective."

[3.0] "What is WWE doing with this title? Short Reigns, Title Changes without explanation, right now this title has nothing of value. YES, Sasha and Charlotte are giving good matches, but the Booking is very bad. What's Next, Charlotte Win the title in Roadblock And sasha wins again in the next Raw ?"

[10.0] "It's one of the more prestigious belts in WWE, it always follows tradition of the champion coming out last and sets up NXT style matches for the women. It's also booked to be on the co-main level of the WWE title and often kicks off hour 3 of Raw as to say it gets the audience in for that hour. Now it even main events Raw too and has a consistent legendary rivalry feuding over it with great matches. It's currently the best championship on Raw."

[6.0] "Yes the design is a ripoff of the men's WWE world heavyweight title but would rather have that than the stupid butterfly design of the diva's title. It looked like a barbie doll assessory or something a preteen girl designed in art class. As far as Charlotte being the first champ, to WWE the Flair name means money and they saw no one else except maybe Sasha Banks that would be even close to Charlotte Flair as a big money maker as women's champ. Some fans might disagree but that's what the folks in charge of WWE decided. As I thought Sasha did get a brief reign as champ which ended all to soon at Summerslam. Overall, the this belt could have been done better but it is an improvement over the divas title. Haters should be glad they didn't just redesign the divas title adding rainbows, unicorns and teddy bears."

"How is it possible, that a title, which has less than two weeks of history, gets a 9+ rating ? thats absurd !"