Beverly Brothers

[6.0] "They did pretty well, and in a way underrated. At the time they just annoyed me, but I can see now the talent that was there, good tag team, and it was their job to annoy me."

[6.0] "I thought they were underrated. They were made to look credible when they first arrived but most of their big wins was beating up on an over the hill Bushwhackers team. They never seemed to break through the glass ceiling. They could beat the jobbers and lower end baby face teams but immediately lose the tag title matches."

[7.0] "Expectational soild tag team for any promotion. Never liked them as the Beverly Brothers, just a crony early 90's WWF gimmick. they were solid enough in the ring and their promo work was meh in my opinion. I've always like Wayne Bloom more however."

[7.0] "Good pairing! A sum far stronger than it's parts. "The Beverly Brothers" though... disrespectful in that; which was Beau, which was Blake? WHO CARES! ? ! With names like "Wayne" and "Mike" - while dull, does help differentiate the two. I never once called either of them Beau nor Blake. I called them WAYNE AND FKN MIKE! Anyway, The Destruction Crew along with The Trooper were some of the only good things going on in the AWA at the time. The two did solid work as The Minnesota Wrecking Crew 2, for me that gimmick worked on multiple levels. Unfortunately Wayne dropped out of the business rather quickly, leaving Mike Enos to flounder indefinitely- drat. Good watchable stuff against The Nasty Boys & High Energy. While a solid team, they wrestled the Bushwhackers too often (once is more than enough) and didn't have much chemistry with The Natural Disasters, another team they seemingly faced 900 times. 6.75 rounded up."

[7.0] "A perfectly solid bruiser team. The "Beverly" gimmick wasn't the best way to present them but they still did good work, and generally look good whenever they show up elsewhere as well."