DeutschEnglish
You are on the public version of the site. | Log In | Register | Password lost?

Bayley vs. Charlotte vs. Sasha Banks

Match

Match Data
Fixture:
Date:
25.09.2016
WON rating:
***1/4
Match type:
6.77
Current Total Rating (?)
Valid votes: 145
Number of comments: 33
10.0 0x
9.0 1x
8.0 30x
7.0 62x
6.0 45x
5.0 4x
4.0 2x
3.0 0x
2.0 0x
1.0 1x
0.0 0x
Average rating: 6.77  [145]
Average rating in 2026: 6.70  [10]
Average rating in 2025: 6.70  [20]
Average rating in 2024: 6.91  [22]
Average rating in 2023: 6.44  [9]
Average rating in 2022: 7.14  [7]
Average rating in 2021: 6.75  [8]
Average rating in 2020: 6.00  [5]
Average rating in 2019: 6.67  [6]
Average rating in 2018: 7.40  [5]
Average rating in 2017: 7.00  [6]
Average rating in 2016: 6.77  [47]
Your Options:
Other:
InfiniteWick wrote on 14.10.2025:
[6.0] "A decent outing between three/fourths of the horse women. Charlotte is the champ here and naturally the story is that both Sasha & Bailey want to get to her first, but throughout the match their friendship gets tested. Sasha's back is worked here but it never really leads to anything. Theres a couple obvious spot setups sprinkled in throughout the match, and the finish is kinda bad. I recall 9 years ago that this finish of just the Big Boot was controversial and I understand it. It just seems less impactful than whatever else she does here. I did think the urge to win and compete on all three ladies, apart from some bad spots, was very apparent. The pace is good and the action is good, but there is, undoubtedly, some bad moments here. The good barely outshines the bad, so I will rate it as such. [**.75]"
ferrante207 wrote on 24.03.2025:
[6.0] "This had all the pieces to be good--three talented workers, a title on the line, a PPV stage--but it just never quite clicked. Like a lot of WWE triple threats, it felt clunky and overproduced. Too often it fell into the familiar rhythm of one person selling on the outside while the other two traded spots, which made the pacing feel stop-start and disconnected. There were some solid sequences and each woman had moments to shine, but the match never found a natural flow. It wasn't bad by any means, just awkwardly structured and lacking the cohesion these three are capable of in better settings. Decent, but underwhelming."
Zak22 wrote on 27.09.2024:
[7.0] "fine match, some nice athleticism and some bits of invention. Some bits look a bit shit or awkward though. But its good"
12psi wrote on 01.08.2024:
[6.0] "Solid match for all three competitors that takes off hot but unfortunately doesn't keep that steam all the way throughout. Always great chemistry with these three, and I liked both the outside interference and the fun spot for the finish, even if it's a little overkill for Charlotte."
ZooWee wrote on 29.04.2023:
[7.0] "Pretty fun match that is let down by a stupid finish. All 3 women have great chemistry and they put on a pretty fun 3 way match. But then the finish happens, and it's extremely unexpected and extremely underwhelming. Charlotte hits Bayley with a boot that knocks her into Sasha, who gets knocked off of the apron. Charlotte then hits Bayley with another boot, pins her, and then just wins. She wins after hitting a basic move. Extremely bizarre way to end, what was otherwise a great match. Probably would've rated this an 8 or something if the finish had been stronger. ***3/4"
GonzoAppreciator wrote on 24.05.2022:
[7.0] "This was a pretty fun triple threat. You can always count on a match between a combination of the Four Horsewomen to be great and this was no exception. I liked Charlotte using a different finish to win the match."
Garmonbozia wrote on 01.03.2022:
[7.0] "They did a triple dropkick. Dana Brooke helped Charlotte. These women had a good and exciting match."
TheLegitBoss wrote on 18.01.2022:
[8.0] "Great match between Banks, Bayley and Charlotte here which I really don't understand why it's so underrated because it's surely one of the best women's matches of 2016 in the main roster to be honest, seeing how so many people didn't appreciate this match so much really surprises me but I'm no one to judge after all and personally it doesn't change my appreciation at all. In my opinion this was a very compelling three-way between three of the best female wrestlers in the history of this company, I'm obviously not surprised that this one delivered as it was already announcing great things on paper and I'm glad that it was confirmed. Excellent action with a solid chemistry between the three of them who combined very well, several fun spots as well as a good progressive story between Banks & Bayley. Charlotte's heel-work combined with the babyface-work of the other two (who were also attacking each other) made for an interesting mix, the action was super clean and the crowd was invested so nothing negative to say apart from that underwhelming ending."
TR23x wrote on 29.11.2021:
[5.0] "A very underwhelming match, Don't know why . This just doesn't click. The Finish didn't actually help the case either."
nWo Member wrote on 25.10.2020:
[4.0] "Not a big fan of this match. The pace was good, but i didn't like Dana Brooke interference and the finish to the match was really bad"
yungbear wrote on 31.05.2019:
[6.0] "Dana interference wasn't always thought out and played too much of a factor for the entirety of the match. Weird finish given that Charlotte's Big Boot wasn't established until that night."
Dragon Fighter wrote on 04.05.2018:
[7.0] "This was really good but the dana interference prevented this from being great. Just all kinds of action as you would expect from the 3 way formula and from 3 of 4 horsewomen. Really good chemistry with some very nice counters."
Ice wrote on 22.09.2017:
[7.0] "This match was actually very good! It didn't have the cleanest of endings, but it was well worked and it's what you would expect out of three of the four horsewomen. ***1/2"
molemaster43 wrote on 05.01.2017:
[6.0] "It was a decent enough match, but a shoddy ending contributed to the downfall of what could have been an exciting bout."
NastyYaffa wrote on 20.12.2016:
[9.0] "Looks like I am in the minority when I say this - but I thought that this was absolutely EXCELLENT. The Four Horsewomen just know how to tie great storytelling into these action packed multi-woman matches. On par with the WM32 triple threat. ****1/4"
jboyaquar wrote on 17.10.2016:
[6.0] "I'm with 'Dowkesy' on this one... fine match with whatever awkward moments overcome by the women's ability to push-forward w/out a second thought. Outside of her always terrible backcracker, Sasha's double-knees, especially one to the outside on Bailey, looked good as did Charlotte's moonsault from the top as its vertical and the way she held her body looked every bit the swan she aspires to be. What I fail to understand about the No-DQ rule on Triple Threats is why a ref would allow Dana ringside. Does she have a manager's license? Any ref would know that D Brooke will at one point interfere, and despite the No-DQ rule, it doesn't appear that her interference would be in-line with the spirit of the match as created by face GM Mick Foley. I know the WWE brass, (Triple H, ) has a Jones for D Brooke but constant interference w/out strategically placing it in certain matches over others will eventually sour the crowd on D Brooke. Her success, like most, is predicated on the audience feeling something pure (love/hate) for her and her constant presence/interference will instead make the audience bitter that she's even around."
TheOneWhoKnocks wrote on 10.10.2016:
[7.0] "Good match for the most part. All three women did a good job in the match, although Sasha still looks remarkably un-crisp, and Charlotte in particular was very good. Bayley impressed with what little she was actually allowed to do. Unfortunately, this match suffered from a sloppy finish and the fact they made Bayley look like an absolute chump with how she was booked in this match. She spent long periods just knocked to the ground and then got pinned with an average looking boot from Charlotte."
Dowkesy wrote on 09.10.2016:
[6.0] "Fine match, some awkward moments but generally decent, was impressed with charlotte and there was some good things here but in general an average match and nothing special, *** is my rating"
SMKVB wrote on 06.10.2016:
[8.0] "A solid match from the 3. They didn't try too much and showed they can have good matches without needing all the high spots. At the same time the match would've benefited greatly from at least one big spot."
Jobbs wrote on 05.10.2016:
[7.0] "I thought this match was good but nothing special honestly as I didn't get into this 3 way as much as I did with the 3 way bout that had Becky at Mania. Bayley didn't do much for me here and the Brooke interference didn't help matters either. The finish also was a let down as it just put a terrible ending to what could've been a really good match. (***1/4)"
The Chosen One wrote on 29.09.2016:
[1.0] "Very, very disappointing match. Bayley did practically nothing in this match. Sasha was the MVP in my opinion. Dana's interference was very bad and those two should have been split up a long time ago. Ending was very bad also. Sasha defiantly should have won and really should never have lost the title."
Glover wrote on 29.09.2016:
[6.0] "The experience these three have had with one another showed here, but it also didn't bring the match to any particular highs. Sasha and Charlotte have both regressed as wrestlers since being called up to the main roster, just not having as much structure (or safety) as they once did, with their Raw Title match after Battleground being the notable exception. Bayley is still very good in the ring, but she couldn't elevate this match alone. Dana's presence is barely existent, which makes no sense in a match explicitly stated to be No DQ. This match just kind of went in and out of sequences without feeling like it flowed in a way that made any real sense. In the end Charlotte retains with a BOOT to Bayley, something she's never even gotten a real nearfall off of in the past, which makes Bayley look like shit. The action was pretty good and the crowd cared, though, so this still absolutely out-performed the Summerslam match. ***1/4"