Doc Gallows & Karl Anderson vs. Eric Young & Joe Doering

[4.0] "A snoozefest between two heel teams that failed to have an invested crowd, failed to deliver a story and even failed in the moves department. **."

[6.0] "That was solid enough. Both teams have a good chemistry together. Doering and Gallows playing the big hosses as Anderson and Young are the sneaky smaller dudes. Nice brawl between them, for sure, but this lacked a bit of intensity. The final stretch was cool, nevertheless."

[6.0] "Another shocking result. Doc Gallows & Karl Anderson lost their titles in a difficult match for themselves absolutely honestly. Wow. Eric Young & Joe Doering crushed the entire fight of the rivals and as a result, 11 minutes was enough for them. Maybe Jay White put it on the wrong ones after all..."

[6.0] "Fine tag match where we saw new champions finally after a reign of lacklustre and overpowered stories The Good Brothers have involved during their reign. VBD is a team of stars that carry this promotion alongside many with their characterisation being intriguing and creatively strong and them winning again had me happy. Hope this reign would reinstate the prestige of the tag division. 3 out of 5 stars!"

[8.0] "I really liked this. I'm not a big fan of the Good Brothers but they can carry a solid match. Eric Young is on a hot streak and gave another great match, and Doering really stepped up in this one. He gave a real intense fight. I'm happy for VBD getting the titles back."

[7.0] "I'm glad VBD finally got a decent title during this feud they've been putting in work for impact for a while. Not to mention both teams are pretty good competitors. I left this match not really feeling like The Good Brothers lost a lot of their appeal or felt weak after this lost which is always a good sign. Doering sticks out again to me as really pulling out some good character work. ***1/2"

[5.0] "Wasn't into this match, the wrestling was fine but I don't care about the Good Brothers and out of all the teams on Impact VBD wasn't the one I was rooting to take the belts off them (Would've gone with OGK personally) not bad but still a weak match for me"

[5.0] "It was a fine yet forgettable match. The Good Brothers are capable but don't interest me much after very a long title reign. And with the exception of Joe Doering, VBD is a really mid stable, so them winning the belts is underwhelming. EY can still go but isn't worth investing in anymore and I don't know why they keep Deaner around. GoD, Bennett/Taven and Swann/Mack should be challenging for the tag titles."

[7.0] "This didn't carry the same energy as the rest, but the build to get here was worth it in the end. Doering is a monster, Eric Young knows his stuff and does it well. Good Brothers did a good enough job. They've been treading in the water and stayed complacent. They can claim to be one of the best, let's see if this lit a fire to start preforming at a higher level."

[5.0] "And of course the weakest match on this show. Two very bad teams and didn't show anything supernatural. I don't understand why Rich Swann, Mack, Kanellis and Taven are on the Pre-show, and these are almost in the main event. What's the joke? Why am I not amused? ) **1/2"

[7.0] "Now, this match is anything but bad. Aside from the G. o. D. stuff, the match is the best they could do I think and we have new Impact World Tag Team Champions (finally? ). For me, this is a good match."