[4.0] "A perfectly fine match that did what it needed to do on the card. Nothing wrong with it, but nothing that's going to stick with you either. You watch it, you move on. No reason to go back and rewatch, and not something you'd point anyone toward, but it got the job done in the moment."
[7.0] "Very good match, one of the best from 2012 NXT. Two really talented workers who have chemistry with one another and got time to work. 3.5 stars"
[6.0] "This was a good match. This wasn't very long, but you could tell even back then that they had chemistry, something they would prove in late 2014 when they formed their tag team. NXT helped give Tyson Kidd a platform to show off what he could do at a time when the main roster had him positioned as a lower card guy. This was just a very well worked match, capped off by a great looking European uppercut near the end followed up by a Gotch Neutralizer. ***1/4"
[6.0] "It was a good match, but I was pretty surprised to see a main roster title being defended in NXT. Other than that, Cesaro and Kidd put up a good fight and I thought they had pretty good chemistry together, maybe that's why they were a team on the main roster. ***"
[7.0] "Great little hidden gem. These two made such a good team and good opponents here. Such a shame what happened to Tyson, he was so good in the ring. Could have easily watched these two go for 30 minutes"
[7.0] "A really fun little technical exhibition between two underrated athletes. Cesaro was in the midst of his US Title reign, and this was exactly what he need - a good and enjoyable title defense against a great worker. With more time and proper build up, this could've been a heck of a match. [***1/4]"
[8.0] "This fully delivered. Is it a bummer that the best NXT match since the reboot to this date came via two wrestlers who are on the main roster fighting over a main roster title? A little, but it was still great and let Kidd perform as well as I? ve ever seen him."
0x
0x
4x
12x
3x
2x
1x
0x
0x
0x
0x