[4.0] "A synonym for the quintessential average Clash from mid-'94 to mid-'96. A halfway decent under- and midcard, but a lousy last match. Once again, Leslie and Sullivan--arguably the worst performers on the entire roster--are pitted against Hulkamania in the show's main event. As Vader would painfully discover following this event, Hulkamania is set to steamroll everything in its path during the aforementioned period. My MOTN: Eaton vs. the young Wright. It barely causes any reaction, but it's the cleanest and most challenging match here and now. Otherwise, one could mention the transformation of Guardian Angel/Big Bossman back into Big Bubba Rogers, but there's no need to. Not a must-see event."

[6.0] "Ok wrestling until the few spots in the main. Really liked the production and presentation in Vegas. The Macho revival elbow and the no sold power bomb felt really disconnected and just a Hogan deal. Arn/Badd is the match worth going out of your way to see."

[4.0] "Not a terrible show, but the main event drags it down a bit. Hogan/Vader feud looks to be fun, but Kevin Sullivan as the top heel shouldn't be a thing. The Harlem Heat match was probably the best, but even it was just above average. Totally skippable show."

[4.0] "Outside the main event this was a fairly decent Clash; the Anderson vs. Badd opener was solid; Eaton made Wright look great in their match; Harlem Heat vs. Stars & Stripes was OK, and I really didn't mind Sting vs. Avalanche too much and thought the Guardian Angel/Bubba Rogers turn angle worked well enough. As to the main event... yeah, it was a mess. The action never really became cohesive, the flying elbow revival spot was silly (but, at least, memorable, and gave me a joke to use at every future CPR training class I would take), and while we got to see Vader confront Hogan, Hogan didn't do anything to make him seem like a threat. Two thirds of an OK show but part of a definite late-series slump for the Clashes."

[3.0] "This would probably get a better rating if it wasn't for the main event, or even if I saw it out of context, but unfortunately that's not the case. It's clear to see that Hogan's ego is more important than the promotion itself or the careers of many of its wrestlers. If you care about anything other than meaningless spectacle, avoid this."

[3.0] "The undercard was solid. But then the last two matches happened, and this became an all-time shit Clash of the Champions show ever. Avoid this. Seriously."

[4.0] "Really liked the first two matches, especially Wright/Eaton which was the MOTN. WCW Tag match was solid. Sting/Avalanche wasn't very good and Big Bossman's turn was kind of random. Main event stunk, for a moment it was excited to see Vader beat up Hogan, but Hogan just no sold everything so it didn't matter."

[3.0] "It's unbelievable how bad this Clash of the Champions could be. The main event is one of the worst matches, there is no psychology and everything seems ridicolous. The first match is the only good stuff from the show, the rest fails or is just simply boring. 1994 was good for WCW until the second half, 1995 starts in the worst way and does not hype the next event. Skippable."

[3.0] "For the thirtieth Clash, I expected better. Not necessarily because of the talent involved, but because it's the big three-oh! I hoped dudes would overachieve. But alas, they did not. The undercard that saw Arn Anderson vs. Johnny B. Badd and Alex Wright vs. Bobby Eaton couldn't overcome the dreadful matches higher up on the card. Pass on this Clash."