[5.0] "A bang average In Your House show. The fact that the crowd was very hot, especially for the main event, helps it some. No terrible bouts across the card, but also really nothing memorable besides how hot the fans were for the main event. Heat aside, it didn't perform all that remarkably either. Not a show I'd recommend, but not a waste of your time if you decide to pop it on either."

[6.0] "In Your House 9 was a event that wasn't in my plans to have some better matches than expected but it was good, with the Main Event, that 6 man tag team being a surprise to me with great participation of each one, also Marc Mero vs Steve Austin, and not as bad as I was expecting. 6/10"

[4.0] "4/10 - BAD - Austin can make anything seem intense, but Mero did his job as well. Everything other than that and the main event sucked. That's saying something because for two wrestlers as well known as Undertaker and Goldust, it seemed like they had no chemistry at all."

[6.0] "The main event was awesome, but it seemed like everything else dragged. Austin and Mero had a good match, but Undertaker/Goldust and Mankind/Godwinn were terrible."

[5.0] "Mostly a filler PPV with some story progression but not that much in terms of wrestling outside of the main event. Nothing awful here but a lot of mid. Rating for the matches Bradshaw vs. Vega (4/10) Bodydonnas vs. Smokin Gunns (4/10) Mankind vs. Godwinn (5/10) Austin vs Mero (6/10) Undertaker vs Goldust (4/10) Camp Cornette vs Sid, Johnson and HBK (8/10)"

[5.0] "It was alright - a pleasant, not too long of a watch with a very good main event. The opener was fine The Smoking Gunns slowly finding their ground as the heels, while Mankind vs Godwinn was nothing exciting, but still professional at least. Then Austin and Mero had their rematch that didn't match the quality of their bout from King of the Ring, but they weren't going for it and still delivered something pretty good. The Undertaker vs Goldust also didn't get me out of my seat, but it wasn't horrible and served its purpose as they set up Taker vs Mankind, and then the main event was the best match of the show with Sid being the main star and the crowd fully behind him. Vader gets put over big and the build for his match with Shawn looks great so far."

[5.0] "Bit of a filler PPV outside the main event. The main event and Austin/Mero were the best matches on the card, with everything else being, quite frankly, uninteresting."

[4.0] "The main event and Austin/Mero delivered. But overall it was a card that looked really interesting on paper (especially if you include Warrior and Roberts) but sorely lacked in execution. The lack of clean finishes really hurt. A very skippable PPV."

[3.0] "Pretty lousy IYH! The main event is the only saving grace as Michaels brings it tonight and he had a pretty good support cast."

[4.0] "Despite the events of the last few weeks with the Austin 3:16 promo and the formation of the NWO on WCW, this show was very much in the mid-90s style, and a good reminder that things didn't change overnight. There was some good stuff here but nothing memorable, and everything bar the main event could have been TV matches."

[4.0] "The main event, the 6-man tag with Vader/Owen/Bulldog vs HBK/Sid/Ahmed was a lot of fun and did a good job of playing to the participants' various strengths. Overall, though, this was the definition of an "adequate" show - nothing specifically wrong with it; no bad matches or anything, but also nothing worth going out of your way to see."

[6.0] "Pretty good show, it had only five matches and nothing was bad. Opener is okay tag team match. Mankind vs H. O. G is simply a squash. Austin vs Mero is good. Undertaker vs Goldust is solid. Main event is sometimes boring but overall it was a good match."

[4.0] "The main event was great and entertaining and Steve Austin vs Mero was okay at best but thats about it for this PPV."

[4.0] "The main event is great, the rest of the event is bad, except for Steve Austin vs Marc Mero which is a solid match, but nothing major, just a good fight between two of the best midcarders. Undertaker vs Goldust is terrible, the first two matches have no interest at all. Still the main event has some surprises, it's not a terrible event but it's weak."