[4.0] "This was Vince's attempt at seeing if he could make weekly PPVs work. Considering we never got anymore, I assume the costs weren't worth what he got out of this show. He tried everything he could to draw interest, such as a Hogan world title win and the first encounter of the hottest feud in the company at that point, but This Tuesday in Texas really amounts to very little. Savage and Jake just don't get the time to do what they needed to do to make this pay off, which makes me think this was an appetizer for a feud that got cancelled. Hogan/Taker is incredibly weak, and the remaining matches are passable at best. Bret can only do so much with Skinner, and Bulldog/Warlord have had so many PPV matches at this point in a row that they couldn't do anything new. The crowd WAS electric for this show, for what it is worth, but that's the only positive. A really subpar event."

[4.0] "This was a very average event. This show had three very mediocre matches and two pretty bad matches."

[5.0] "[5.3] I thought this was quite an entertaining show. The main event was a mess but still had its moments and the crowd was wild for it. My favourite part of this show is the unbelievable promo work of Roberts and Savage, as well as their match being really decent - again watching all these old shows its amazing how much a pair of talented guys like them could get out of not much, they didn't need insane spots or convoluted storylines to get you to want to watch more. Bret match was OK too."

[3.0] "What's the point? They could have been replaced by a SNME episode, and it is look like an SNME episode without ads. I'm still couldn't figure how or why did they choose this set of matches. We could have got a better card."

[4.0] "My rating for This Tuesday In Texas 1991, it's a 4/10 an event that If It didn't got saved by the 2 first matches of Skinner vs Bret Hart and the feud of Randy Savage vs Jake Roberts, It would've been low and low. Matches that didn't had a huge construction or something, besides this was the week after Survivor Series 1991, so It is understand, and the only thing they got ready was Hogan winning again the World title, 4/10"

[5.0] "A series of "I Can't Believe it's not a House Show! " matches, aside from the fact that a title changed hands. The most noteworthy part of this show wasn't the WWF Championship victory in the main event after a poor match, it was the fantastic promos from "Macho Man" Randy Savage and Jake "The Snake" Roberts intended to add fire to their blood feud, which never got a proper ending after their short match here and the violent, passionate continuation in the ring and backstage. On the bright side, this show set up the best Royal Rumble match in history a little over a month later."

[3.0] "After sacrificing the 1991 Survivor Series, the WWF underwhelms with a piss poor show with This Tuesday in Texas. The highlight of the show was the Savage/Roberts match, and even then, it's more about the angle after the match. The angle is stellar and is the best thing on this otherwise average TV episode of a PPV. The main event between Hogan/Taker was better than the Survivor Series outing, but it was still an average match with a messy finish. The rest of the show was below average trite with nothing matches. Instead of making two ass PPVs in a week, maybe they could've put on one good PPV instead."

[6.0] "Fun short event with a super hot crowd making everything better. Bret was completely off his game surprisingly but everyone delivered otherwise, with all the stuff in the middle being far better than it had any right to be. The post-match angle in the Savage-Roberts match was an all-timer. The main event was crap but not as crap as their effort the week before, and the finish allows the title to be held up and moved onto someone else."

[8.0] "I've been generally harsh on the Golden Era PPVs, but I have very few complaints about this concise, crowd pleaser of a show. The short card (or at least, the short portion of the card that was actually televised on PPV) actually worked out to be in this show's favor, in terms of all killer-->no filler average match quality. The card doesn't have a single terrible, waste of time or squash match (I'm not sure this has happened once before on a prior WWF PPV, minus some aimless and low stakes early Survivor Series cards), while both the epic Roberts/Savage showdown and the spectacle title match finish were notably memorable. Maybe just as important for me, WWF thought it might finally be a good idea for this show to focus on actual wrestling storylines for a PPV and take a break from all of the forced patriotic and wartime nonsense shoved into every promo and a third of the gimmicks over the majority of 1990 and 1991. Honestly, my biggest complaint about this show is what didn't happen. How do you place Piper vs. Flair in a dark match? Seriously, how do you not put that on the televised PPV portion for posterity? I'm 100% certain without having even seen it that the crowd was white hot for that match. It sucks that they yanked the belt so quickly off of The Undertaker, but I'm not going to hold that booking decision against the show. The match was wildly entertaining, minus a short stretch in the middle in which heel Taker fell in love with the chokehold again. This isn't one of the best PPV's of all-time, but I do find it wildly underrated and a rare example of actual match quality consistency for this era. Since half of the card was composed of dark matches, the WWF still didn't really know how to trim the fat for its live audience at this stage, but at least they trimmed it for the televised crowd and posterity."

[6.0] "Really short PPV, but it wasn't really scheduled until the last minute. Savage and Jake's feud continues to entertain while Flair and Hogan seemed to be the buildup match, but Vince got into his own head and messed that up. Santana and Virgil's match was pretty good as well, and may have been the best match of the night. Not the greatest PPV, but acceptable."

[6.0] "I liked this show more than I expected to. On paper the card doesn't look all that remarkable, but what is missing from just looking at the lineup is all of the terrific storyline progression in the Roberts vs. Savage feud. This angle dominates the run time of the show and has multiple promos and segments - and they are all excellent. It feels extremely heated, and has a much darker, more serious tone than a lot of what was happening in the WWF around this time. The other matches aren't amazing or anything, but I thought they ended up at least being decent compared with my fairly low expectations. The show barely makes it over 90 minutes, so it's a pretty breezy watch, but even if you're not interested in any of the other matches I would strongly recommend skipping through and watching everything related to Roberts and Savage (two pre-match promos, the match itself, a post-match angle, and two post-match promos)."

[7.0] "This was a very good, and in my opinion, underrated show. A show mostly remembered for holding the World title rematch between Hulk Hogan and new champion The Undertaker. What this show should be remembered for is the stuff between Jake Roberts and Randy Savage, as the stuff between those two at the time was awesome in my opinion. This show is better than the Survivor Series that had just preceded this a week prior in my opinion."

[6.0] "Surprisingly better than Survivor Series a week earlier. The IC title match is an average opener, Bret does great and Skinner is not half bad lacks heat though (5/10) Savage/Roberts is a short grudge fight that does everything it could in only 6 minutes but it gets a high rating from me considering all the great promos and the awesome post match angle that whole feud is the highlight of the night (8/10) Bulldog/Warlord is not as good as as their Mania bout but Davey Boy still does some cool spot to keep it from being a total bore (5/10) The DiBiase/Virgil tag match is a fine classic style tag match, great heel work from the Million Dollar Man and decent babyface fire from Virgil at points. Santana even with the silly gimmick always helps improve matches he's in (6/10) Hogan/Taker is the big thing that keeps the show from being a 7. It's just as much of a slog as their previous bout. Hogan only had good matches sometimes and Taker only had great matches in different eras. At least it build towards the Rumble (3/10)"

[6.0] "It was a decent show with some good matches that didn't take too long. The opener was okay and Bulldog vs Warlord was a good bout too. The whole angle with Roberts and Savage was phenomenal and I couldn't take my eyes away from what was happening, especially as Jake was incredible in his heel role. The Tag Team Match wasn't bad and the main event was certainly better then Hogan's and Taker's last match. All in all the PPV was a nice watch and with 1h30m of runtime you couldn't get bored."

[3.0] "The more I watch old WWF, the more I wonder how they were so popular. I get the different time argument, but how. This just feels like a straight up house show. The only reason for Hogan vs Taker to happen at SS was to do the match again here. And why wouldn't they put Flair vs Piper on the main show? That sounds so much better than anything else on this show."

"Honestly, TTIT is not that awful. Hart/Skinner was solid, Savage/Roberts was more story than match but Macho Man's after match Joker promo had me a little frightened LOL. Bulldog/Warlord and the tag match was honestly not my cup of tea, but down to the main event. Hulk Hogan vs. The Undertaker.. I liked it, I really did. I always enjoy seeing The Hulkster doin his 80s stuff and seeing The Undertaker no-sell everything just made it way more fun to me. My favorite part had to be seeing Hulk roll The Undertaker up I have no idea why it just cracks me up so much. All in all I would say it's a solidly average PPV. Watch it if you can."

[3.0] "Bad show. Very fillerish. None of the matches were good and only one was what I'd consider to be a 5/10."

[5.0] "Jake/Savage is a required viewing for any new wrestling fan. Bret/Skinner was good too and the rest was good enough."

[7.0] "Underrated PPV, better than most people tend to give its credit for. Granted, the whole concept was a big flop overall in the end, but the actual card was actually fairly enjoyable in my opinion. Macho/Roberts was an awesome sprint followed by an even more AWESOME post-match angle, and the DiBiase/Virgil tag was energetically fun. Even matches where you think might suck on paper didn't suck - Bret/Skinner was perfectly acceptable for a PPV opener, while Bulldog/Warlord was a fine powerhouse battle. Hogan/UT main event was memorable for sure, even if the action in the match wasn't too pleasing. Plus you also have Gorilla & Heenan on commentary and a red hot San Antonio crowd, which is always a positive in any situation."

[5.0] "Long story short, a PPV that existed just for the sake of existing. It certainly is an easy watch at just 1h30, though I don't think I can say I'd recommend it either. Nothing is particularly bad outside of the main event in my opinion, but nothing goes too far beyond the average level either. Apart from the awesome work by Roberts and Savage, who unquestionably stole the show here."

[5.0] "Bret Hart vs. Skinner. Not what you? d call a great use of Bret? s talents. Steve Kiern was well past his prime, considering he was one of the top junior wrestlers over a decade earlier. This was actually better than I remembered it, but just average for Bret. **. Jake Roberts vs. Randy Savage. This was surprisingly short for a blood feud. *3/4. The match was nothing, but the aftermath is a must-see. Jake is evil on a ? forcing Ray Liotta to eat his own brain? level. Davey Boy Smith vs. The Warlord. I believe this would be the last singles PPV appearance for the Warlord. He would make a brief appearance in the Royal Rumble the following month, and then he disappeared. It seemed odd because he was at least as talented as a lot of the other stiffs, but this was also around the time that the WWF was being investigated for steroid distribution, so Warlord probably wasn? t the guy you want out front. This was bad on a number of levels. 1/4*. Virgil & Tito Santana vs. Ted Dibiase & Repo Man. Virgil won the Million Dollar Title at Summerslam ? 91, so Dibiase hired Repo Man to help him get it back. Tito and Repo start out, and my how these two have fallen since WrestleMania IV. Tito now has green tights and pink boots, and the other one is the fuckin? Hamburglar. Fun match, considering three of the four participants were jobbers. **1/4. The Undertaker vs. Hulk Hogan. Taker won the title thanks to interference by Ric Flair, so the WWF demanded a rematch at Tuesday in Texas. Thankfully better than the SS match, but still no classic by any stretch of the imagination. *1/2. This show was, thankfully, a financial flop or else we might never have had a Monday Night Raw. None of the matches are worth watching, but definitely try to catch the aftermath of the Savage-Jake match just to get a look at what a real heel is supposed to look like."

[6.0] "Not a bad show, though certainly far from amazing. Savage/Roberts was the best match on the show, and about a million times better than the match was the fantastic angle that followed it, Jake was absolutely on fire in this period. The tag team match was also solid, and the main event was certainly historic if nothing else."

[6.0] "Surprisingly pretty good event. Skinner vs Hart is very enjoyable IC title match. Jake vs Savage is short but good match. Howewer postmatch segment is even better. Simply watch it by yourself, it was badass. Warlord vs Bulldog is okay. Tag team match is surprisingly very good. Main event is a total disaster but overall show is still enjoyable."

[5.0] "Way better than Survivor Series 1991, but not a good event, only a few days after the other pay per view. Bret Hart vs Skinner is the best match in terms of quality, I prefer the short Randy Savage vs Jake Roberts match, with an interesting epilogue. British Bulldog vs Warlord was too long and boring, the tag team is okay and Undertaker vs Hogan is better thant their previous match but still slow, some parts of the crowd wanted Taker to win. The ending serves to get people happy for Hogan and vacate the title as soon as possible."

[6.0] "Though the Tuesday night PPV experiment might not have been a success - any more than it was a decade later with Taboo Tuesday - this was still a solid show overall. Macho Man and Jake Roberts definitely stole the show - their match could have stood to be a bit longer, but the post-match stuff was very intense and did a great job of furthering their feud. Bret vs. Skinner was also a strong match and Bulldog vs. Warlord was surprisingly good as well. Main event was OK for an early Taker match also featuring Hogan, and the booking of it did a reasonably good job of not making Taker look like too much of a chump for dropping the belt back to Hogan that quickly. Not an essential show, but if you're going through early '90s WWF stuff, it's worth a look."

[5.0] "In the immortal words of Bryan Alvarez, "this was a show. " The tag match is fine, but if it was a ***1/2 affair in 1991, it doesn't come across that well in 2014. Hart-Skinner is fine, Savage-Roberts should have gone 10 minutes longer to be an all-time great match (but the angle and interviews after it are amazing and certainly the high point of the show in terms of quality), and Bulldog-Warlord is not bad. Hogan-Undertaker is... well, it could have been worse. All in all, this is really only top shelf in terms of building the Savage-Roberts feud, with a great post-match angle and an absolutely amazing Roberts interview."