- The Bar eliminate Big Cass & Enzo Amore (6:40) - The Bar eliminate Heath Slater & Rhyno (10:30) - The Bar eliminate The Club (22:30) - The Bar eliminate The Golden Truth (27:45)
[6.0] "A few pretty good matches for this format . The women did not look good at all . There was a Strowman vs. Kalistico match not listed here . It lasted seconds but they did ring the bell . Less jabber jawing which made for a better show . But really considering some of the match ups on this show it could have been better . Matches worth watching : Finn Balor vs. The Miz (w/Maryse) , Big Cass & Enzo Amore vs. Cesaro & Sheamus vs. Heath Slater & Rhyno vs. The Club (Karl Anderson & Luke Gallows) vs. The Golden Truth (Goldust & R-Truth) , Gentleman Jack Gallagher vs. TJP , Bray Wyatt vs. Dean Ambrose and my top match was Samoa Joe vs. Seth Rollins ."
[4.0] "Considering WWE is such an unhip product and produces such run-of-the-mill shows, I should be surprised they attract sell-out after sell-out in major markets, but I'm not as attendance has become more about congregating amongst fellow fools/sufferers or silly nincompoops. But the Western masses aren't moving to Japan anytime soon so the 3rd-rate WWE product will continue to pull the wool over people's eyes. Is it really any irony McMahon and Trump are such good friends? I walk a fine line w/ the Miz; as a mid-card heel on the secondary brand he's entertaining, but when placed in Main Event spots and splattered all over the television programme, he becomes an overbearing baffoon. He can use the Savage 'hide behind my woman' schtick, but when properly motivated Savage was an all-time in-ring great w/ incredible grace & body control. Thus, in a classical sense, Randy could get away w/ that demeaning/demoting behavior. What does the Miz inherently contribute to any in-ring product except for a mastery of WWE rhythms? Then again, The Miz is consistent and has a personality WWE can easily build around. Yet they're clueless when it comes to Cesaro, whose work offers the class of a timeless showman, yet someone whose personality doesn't easily fit into an archetype. Segment-after-segment on this show elicited boo's from the crowd. It's one thing to book consecutive heel victories, but when the plan is to give the crowd/show a face shine w/ the interminably not-over R Reigns all we can do is roll our eyes. WWE=corporate monolith=must push 'our guy' Roman in the European media capital. Even if injured, walking away certainly hurts Brawn's character. It completely contrasts the way he's been booked; if Roman was over it's a nice moment, but he's abhored. Another blah baby... are there many men on the roster who look as typecast for a Dumas villain than S Rollins? Wyatt (almost) always beats Dean-o who (almost) always beats KO. A positive, I enjoyed the tag turmoil. 3. 75"
[5.0] "The whole Dean Ambrose being GM thing was stupid, but there were 2 good matches (Miz vs Balor and Tag Team Turmoil) despite the whole show not meaning very much the show had its good and bad moments."
[6.0] "Show as a whole was okay, but the Tag Team Turmoil match was awesome. 27 minutes of Sheamus and Cesaro showing why they're the best tag team on RAW right now."