[3.0] "Is this the worst WrestleMania ? No ? Is it a snooze fest except for one match ? It sure is ! God awful show, only match worth watching is Taker vs HHH."

[4.0] "After fully watching this show for the first time, I understand why this Mania is so universally hated. Only one great match, a few decent ones, but an awful main event and the worst WWE match EVER make this a poor show, especially for WrestleMania. (4.3/10)"

[5.0] "I honestly think this show is a little underrated, it's far from the worst mania ever. Really just the main and Lawler/Cole that are awful. There's some good matches here, and the Rock stuff (main event aside) is fun."

[2.0] "A bad Wrestlemania. Obviously the match of the night was Undertaker vs Triple H in a brutal match. Cody vs Rey and Randy vs Punk was okay but other than that a really really bad show. Which has gone down as one of the worst Wrestlemania's in history."

[1.0] "An unbelievably awful WrestleMania. HHH/Taker was excellent but that's it for positives, Edge/Del Rio, Orton/Punk and Cody/Rey were all decent but underwhelming and not at the level of a show they advertised as the Biggest WrestleMania Ever. You then have 3 of the absolute worst WrestleMania matches ever, 3 0/10's with Lawler/Cole being right up there with my least favourite matches of all time, and one of the worst Mania main events ever. The Taker match wasn't that much of a stone cold classic that could come within a million miles of saving this show the way Michaels/Taker did the year before; and that show didn't have 3 absolute DUDs."

[2.0] "Easily on of the worst manias in history. Edge/Alberto was mid. Cody/Rey was solid. 8 man tag was a breeze. Randy/Punk was surprisingly slower than I remembered. Lawler/King belongs in the trash. Taker/HHH was iconic. Co main was surprising in terms of Snooki pulling off a cartwheel. Was not expecting that from her. Miz was the only good in that main event."

[1.0] "There's a couple of decent stuff on here but the only thing that REALLY gives this a point is Triple H vs Taker. The rest was terrible. Tag matches that could've been on a literal episode of raw and a AWFUL main event. This show felt like an episode of Raw in a stadium. That's how bad it was."

[2.0] "When they've reached 27 WrestleManias by 2011, they should've known better by then not to a bad one. Edge Vs Del Rio, Rhodes Vs Mysterio and Orton Vs Punk were all good, and Triple H Vs Undertaker no holds barred was incredible, but everything else with the Corre eight man tag, the mixed six man tag involving Snooki, Miz Vs Cena No DQ, and Lawler Vs Cole were the all time worst WrestleMania matches ever, and the show felt like an advertisement for the next two Manias that would be headlined with Cena Vs Rock. Overall WWE WrestleMania 27 (2011) is a really bad show and one of the worst WrestleManias."

"This show gets too much hate. The Pre-Show Battle Royal/US title match was dumb and I hate every 'get everyone on the card' Mania matches. Edge vs Del Rio was a pretty good match, but the wrong guy went over - Edge retires the following night so why not have Del Rio win or at least have Del Rio injure Edge to get some heat. Cody vs Mysterio is a very good match. The Corre tag match is horrible and pointlessly buried an up and coming faction for no reason. Orton vs Punk is pretty good though. Cole vs Lawler is overhated and Heel Michael Cole isn't that bad, it was a good way to cool the crowd down and ultimately no one was hurt by this match, unlike the Corre one. Taker vs HHH is excellent and easily match of the night, and as much as people hated Triple H this match is so good that people would probably be okay with him breaking the streak. The Mixed tag sucked but cooled down the crowd to prepare for the main event. Miz vs Cena kinda sucked, especially the ending, and was basically just a way to setup Rock vs Cena. This show is a lot more 'watchable' than other bad Manias as it somehow has really good pacing, with the shitty short matched being used to cool off the crowd and get them ready for the next big match. I think if HHH vs Taker closed the show people would look upon this show more fondly, as Miz vs Cena leaves a bad taste in your mouth. I think this could be a pretty solid Mania if the card was simply restructured whilst keeping everything else the same."

[2.0] "A pretty good start but went really bad with useless match like the 8 man tag team match and cole vs lawler which is certainly the worst match in wrestlemania history and a disappointing main event which is not worthy of a wrestlemania main event and a bad intervention of the the rock who could not save anything"

"Look, honestly really overhated. It is a dreadful, terrible Wrestlemania. But it has some good stuff, like Triple H vs The Undertaker in arguably a top 10 streak match and the underrated CM Punk vs Randy Orton, which could be better but is good. But on the same show we have Michael Cole vs Jerry Lawler"

[2.0] "Holy fuck this is dreadful. I always forget how wretched this show is from top to bottom. Taker vs triple H on this is the only saving grace. Everything else is either serviceable/okay (like 2 matches) or dreadfully bad."

[3.0] "And people say Wrestlemania 9 is bad? Yeah, this one also gets a reputation as being one of the worst ever, and while I think WM9 gets more hate than it deserves, this one deserves every drop of ire it draws from people. The main event and The Streak match are horrible. Cole and Lawler is unwatchable, Snooki appears and wastes Trish Stratus, and you have an 8 man tag that doesn't even get 2 minutes. It's easier to ask what DID go right in this event. The answer is very little. Edge vs. Del Rio and Punk vs. Orton are the only remotely memorable matches on this card, and neither of them are good enough to warrant a rewatch of the event, let alone saving it. It seems unbelievable to say a Wrestlemania is skippable, but there's truly nothing "Wrestlemania-like" about this event. Maybe not an unwatchable show, but it comes pretty close."

[2.0] "I always want to like this Wrestlemania more than I do, seeing as it was in fact the first one I watched live when I really got into wrestling properly. Unfortunately, it's just not very good at all. The entire show is an overly padded affair with dumb Snoop Dogg segments and the Rock meandering around during the height of his "I'm back but I've seriously lost my spark and it feels rote and joyless" run that he did in the whole two year (ugh) Cena feud. Speaking of overly padded and awful, there's of course the Lawler-Cole match, which is almost certainly the all time worst Wrestlemania match as an agonizing 30 minute segment that no one could possibly enjoy. While that is by far the nadir of the show, it's also surrounded by the dumb nothing Corre match, the dumb corny Snooki match, the awkward and let down main event, and a lot of other matches that really never reach above the level of "fine." Other than completionism, wanting to see the Triple H-Taker match, or a morbid desire to punish yourself (hi there, it's me), there's no reason to really watch this show."

[1.0] "This show sucks. Not only is this show just a prequel to Wrestlemania 28, but asides from one great match, this is a really weak show with stupefying booking decisions. The Undertaker and HHH tore the house down in their stellar No Holds Barred match. It was intense, dramatic, and the crowd was into all of it. Sadly, the same can't be said for the main event. Miz and Cena put on a boring, heatless match that was just there to set up Rock/Cena the next year. Congratulations on the win Miz, a third wheel in his own world title match. Del Rio proved his Rumble win pointless in an average match with Edge, Cody Rhodes got a solid victory over Rey Mysterio, and Punk/Orton put on a solid match even if Orton winning was the safe choice. Less safe was putting Cole and Lawler out there for over 15 minutes in an achingly bad match. We also got to see Snooki wrestle, and that's what Wrestlemania is really all about. Overall, Wrestlemania 27 is a piss poor show that invalidates its own existence as the next Mania is much better."

"Yep this mania sucks. No title changes and it just felt like a long ass trailer for the upcoming Wrestlemania. If anyone thinks wrestlemania 41 had the worst main event please watch this and you'll change your mind. Or actually no don't do it because I don't want you to suffer. Still better than mania 9 and 11."

[2.0] "Sorry, but one good match doesn't save this from being a complete snoozefest of a show. Lousy booking, and even lousier ringwork from most of the performers. Cole and Lawler might be a little overhated, but I can't blame anyone for calling it the worst thing they've seen since Giant Gonzales. And does anyone actually remember the Jersey Shore plug match? I don't have to explain why the main event ending in a count out is awful. Or why it feeling like it exists for the sole purpose of setting up next years wrestlemania. Just atrocious from front to back. At least Taker and Triple H are here. Otherwise I'd probably say it's a straight goose egg of a show."

[6.0] "(5.9/10) If you hated WrestleMania 27, I wouldn't blame you. If you hate Vince's booking methods, then you probably hated theqshow. But don't sleep on Punk/Orton or Taker/HHH II. Those never disappoint. Let's hope I won't have to watch 27 for a very, very long time. Not the worst Mania, but boy it was bad."

[2.0] "The fact that the main event is used to setup Wrestlemania 28 should tell you everything about this event. There's a couple of decent matches (Cody/Mysterio, Punk/Orton and Del Rio/Edge) that are worth revisiting for but aside from Taker/HHH, none of them are really worth being on a Mania card. The rest of the matches are pretty bad and should not be surprised why this Mania is considered if not the worst, at least one of the worst."

[3.0] "Well edge vs del Rio, Cody vs mysterio, punk vs Orton was good. And triple h vs the undertaker would have been the match of the year had it taken place in a different year. With all the positives tho, the negatives outshines everything. This mania without the above mentioned four matches, is beyond watchable. If It was the atitude era and they booked this way, WWF would have shut down in weeks and WCW would have won the wars. And while the idea of setting up the main event of the next year mania is kinda cool, it came with the expense of this show's main event which was already terrible. So this show is literally WWE insulting at its audience for paying for this show. Horrible"

[5.0] "Probably the most hated Wrestlemania of all time (and maybe rightfully so), however it's not a fully skippable show from top to bottom. Three disastrous matches + disappointing main event with Rock's forced hosting as a buildup to next Mania's ME didn't help to build something timeless, but we got another part of Taker vs HHH legendary WM's trilogy and some decent matches in the first part of a show. Far from the greatness, but on the other hand not even close to some of the darker editions from 80s and 90s."

[4.0] "i want to be generous since this is the first mania my parents bought for me to watch live, but looking back, yeah it's a mess. Taker/HHH is very good but it's definitely the weakest out of the long running Michaels and Triple H saga. Undercard is fine but sorely lacking that wrestlemania worthy match, and two of the all time mania stinkers on this show (Cole/Lawler and Miz/Cena) just drag it down. It's how you leave em at the end of the day and realising now how much we got ripped off with that shit ending really leaves a sour taste"

[4.0] "This is a difficult show to rate. Triple H vs. The Undertaker is one of my favourite WrestleMania matches of all time, and most of the midcard matches are fairly solid (albeit, they largely do not feel WrestleMania worthy), particularly Punk vs. Orton. However, this show also has arguably the worst WrestleMania match of all time in Michael Cole vs. Jerry Lawler, and a match that is at the very least a contender for worst WrestleMania main event of all time. It's atrociously booked and ends the show on one of the most sour notes possible. I'd love to give this show a higher rating because I consider Triple H vs. The Undertaker to be an absolute classic and iconic WrestleMania moment, but it's hard to feel any more positive about the event as a whole by the time the PPV ends, and the majority of the night is missing that sense of grandeur and spectacle that you'd hope to see from WrestleMania.. I'd recommend skipping the dreadful Cole vs. Lawler match then just turning the show off entirely after Triple H vs. The Undertaker - that way you get a punchy 2-ish hour event with some good action. Viewed in its entirety? This was a bit of a bust and definitely needed a lot of work to live up to the WrestleMania branding."

[4.0] "Not the worst WrestleMania as many would like to claim, but certainly not a good one. If it weren't for Undertaker and Triple H it might actually be the worst. MVP of the show goes to The Undertaker for an instant classic against Triple H."

[5.0] "One match carry job in the show in the HHH and Undertaker match -Rand/Punk and Cody/Rey were both acceptable as was the world heavyweight title match - the rest was very bad"

[6.0] "1. Edge vs Del Rio was a solid opener. Fun to go back and watch now knowing this was Edges last match for 9 years. 2. Cody vs Rey is a fun underrated match 3. Tag match is useless 4. Punk vs Orton was solid but never really got out of 3rd gear 5. Cole vs Lawler is brutal to get through 6. Undertaker vs HHH was easily MOTN 9/10 7. Mixed tag was dumb but it was quick 8. The best part of the main event is The Miz's video package. It's all pretty rough from there"

[1.0] "Y'know that one show you watch with non-wrestling fans when you're trying to convince them to get into wrestling. This is the opposite of whatever that show is. This is embarassing to watch. Lawler vs Cole might be the worst match in the history of wrestling."

[5.0] "Match 1: 7/10 Match 2: 6/10 Match 3: /10 Match 4: 7/10 Match 5: 2/10 Match 6: 10/10 Match 7: /10 Match 8: 3/10 Total: 5.83/10"

[7.0] "Very average at best main event and a God awful match between Cole and Lawler but there is 4 very strong matches on the card which makes the overall score ridiculous.Undertaker vs Triple H is the match of the night but the early matches were strong before the slack in the middle and the poor main event."

[7.0] "There is one classic on this show and three 8/10 matches which make this a show half worth rewatching but there is some serious lows on the show such as the 2nd worst mania match in history behind the santina Marella battle royale and the main event. Not the best"

[5.0] "the start of the show is actually really good but then after id say the punk orton match its horrible and then a great hhh and taker match and then everything after that is awful so yeahhhhh"

[1.0] "The fact that this is billed "The Biggest Wrestlemania Ever" and is this bad is a dichotomy of what WWE was groveling to its consumers at the time. HHH/Undertaker was a great match but that was the lone bright spot of this card. Arguably the most embarrassing match in WWE history in Cole/Lawler, a dumb semi-main meant to put over a celebrity who can't wrestle, and a contender for the worst WM main event ever (although I will cut Miz all the slack since he was concussed during the match). Thankfully they were able to turn it around somewhat for the second half of the decade."

[0.0] "The fact that I had to spend nine years hearing this piece of trash show be recognized as being the sight of Edge's last match (along with the fact that said last match was not a TLC match against Christian for the WHC) angers me deeply. Between the ATROCIOUS backstage segments, Cole/Lawler being a thing that happened for reasons unknown, Cole's obnoxious heel commentary (thank God he's gotten much better now than Señor Assclown is no more), and the worst John Cena match in this era, there was very little to like about this show. Yeah Taker/Trips was good but compared to their much better encounter at Mania 28, it was nothing all that special."

[5.0] "I won't say this was a good Mania overall, but theres been plenty of worse. Lets start with the good part Edge/Del Rio is a fun fast opener with the heels working over Edge's arm for an easy and solid story (7/10) Mysterio/Rhodes is a bit slower at the start but it does get going pretty well with some good spots involving Cody's mask to make it a fun midcard bout (7/10) Punk/Orton I feel is really underrated, great heel work from punk solid Selling from Orton and I really liked the finish (8/10) and of course Undertaker/Triple H is a banger great brawl bell to bell highlights including the Spinebuster through the annoucers table and Trips tombstone. MOTN without a doubt (9/10). Now for the other half of the show, The eight man tag is worthless and WWE just made their tag champs looked awful for no reason (1/10) The mixed tag was another throwaway bout that was a complete waste of Morrison and Ziggler, at least Trish looked decent (3/10) Lawler/Cole would've been fine if Jerry hit a piledriver after getting cole out of his box and won, but no they dragged on to a 14 minute match with a awful wonky finish (0/10) and then you have the Main Event that, even as a Miz fan, I can't defend at all. The action on the first half is dull and the double count out restart kills any chance of the match getting fun. Rock being the host of the show and interfering in the main event was a bad choice as well (3/10). Half good Half bad so 5/10 overall"

[10.0] "I seriously don't care what anyone has to say about this Wrestlemania. I love this. Why? Because I was a child and was able to attend this event, and I had so much fun. Taker vs HHH was so, so much fun to witness live, and I get why people would hate the main event, but at the time, I liked it, because I was a child and loved John Cena. Don't care, this event was a banger."

[4.0] "This wrestlemania was pretty lackluster and just feels like a setup to next years mania it had some fun matches in the opener, cody vs rey, punk vs orton and taker vs triple h but the rest of the card is horrible."

[4.0] "Weird show. Edge/ADR (if mainly because it was the last match of Edge's first run), Mysterio/Rhodes, Orton/Punk, and Undertaker/HHH are worth the watch so that's half the card actually being good. The other half to contend with is two pointless short tags, Lawler/Cole which really has no redeeming quality anywhere, and Miz/Cena which is one of the weaker WrestleMania main events ever. A totally bland, dead match with a weird ending. More than anything though, what sticks out to me on the show is a terrible atmosphere that's kind of hard to describe. Just corny and dull like nobody really wants to be there, fully capturing the peak of the PG Era vibe which isn't a good thing. The Rock totally phones it in and wastes time as host which doesn't help. This isn't nearly the worst WrestleMania ever but the pros are outweighed by the cons."

[3.0] "Much like Wrestlemania 9, this gets a rep for being one of, if not the absolute worst Wrestlemania but much like Mania 9, I think there's worse ones. The first hour and a half had some pretty solid wrestling and HHH/Taker was rather great, That's about all the positives though because the whole vibe of the show sucked so bad. The PG era has never felt so forced as it does here, so bad and overproduced that not even the Rock can save it, not that he really tried. It's just a "please no one find out that I like wrestling" vibe, even the crowd felt like they didn't wanna be there half the time. Jerry/Cole and the main event absolutely fucking sucked and even the good matches had their issues (most notably heel Michael Cole or a bored JR on commentary for them). Cody/Rey felt a little too weird with the dynamics of Rey stealing the mask, Punk/Orton lingered on the leg stuff a bit too much at the end and Triple H's ego was all over that Taker match. Actually now that I've finished typing this maybe it is one of the worst Mania's fuck this show"

"El pero WM que ví en vivo, solo se salva la lucha entre Undertaker y HHH. No hay campeonatos midcard en la cartelera, luchadores irrelevantes en luchas de relleno y lo peor para mí comentaristas viejos protagonizando una de las historias más "importantes" en este ppv."

"There were some pretty good matches on this card. I feel like a match that should've been good but under-delivered is the Cena/Miz match. I know part of the issue was Miz's concussion. But other than that, the match seemed a bit off."

[5.0] "While there were some big highs on the show (Taker/Triple H, Orton/Punk, Rhodes/Mysterio), the lows of the show were very low (multi-person tags, Cole/Lawler). The Rock was a good host up until the main event where he overshadowed the match and ruined the finish. I wish Bryan and Sheamus could have had a longer match on the main card instead of the dumb multi-man tags."

[2.0] "Very bad. One of the worst WrestleMania. The opening and Streak match were good but everything else was shit with one of the worst main event not only on WrestleMania but in all of professional wrestling."

[2.0] "Basically the worst WrestleMania that I can remember, the fact that The Rock was there was a great attraction but for the same reason I feel that the main focus was him, which affected the card too much and they ended up neglecting it, which was the attraction that Cole and Lawler have a match at Wrestlemania? The Main Event was a disaster... The Miz may be a good guy but he can't headline a Wrestlemania, and the rest of the card felt like a random Raw."

[3.0] "This Wrestlemania is terrible and has a few redeeming qualities. Alberto Del Rio vs Edge was a good opener. It wasn't perfect as some parts felt slow at times but its still a good match. (***1/4) Cody Rhodes vs Rey Mysterio was fine. Nothing too remarkable about the match but it wasn't bad. (**) The Eight Man tag match is skippable and buries the Corre in a minute. (DUD) CM Punk vs Randy Orton was good but didn't pick up the intensity. (***) Jerry Lawler vs Michael Cole is the worst Wrestlemania match of all time. I mean Daniel Bryan and Sheamus were on the preshow but Michael Cole was on the main card? Get out of here! (DUD) Triple H vs Undertaker was MOTN and had a spectacular story around it. Although, Taker did get injured and it mark the decline of his health. (****1/2) The Six Man Tag Match was dreadful and had Snooki from the Jersey Shore. Apparently, John Morrison wanted Melina to be his partner and not Trish so that makes things a bit worse. (DUD) John Cena vs The Miz was an awful main event that only served purpose to buildup John Cena vs The Rock at Wrestlemania 28. Nothing was memorable in this match and even the Miz who was WWE Champion can't remember due to a concussion. (*2/3) Pretty bad Wrestlemania with HHH vs Undertaker and Alberto Del Rio vs Edge the only matches worth watching on the show."

[8.0] "Seriously, last Edge match (in a while), great Triple H v Taker match, Miz the underdog deafeats Super Cena in the main event of the greatest event of the year (with the interfearence from The Rock), great plot twist. To me this is enough to have a great show. The greates? Clearly not, we got some other good matches and yes some very bad ones (some wish I forget moments too ok), but watching it back i feel the emotions I felt the first time and you got 3 matches I will never forget. Me jumping off the seat for the great ending, I was so pleased and happy we didn't got another Cena moment"

[3.0] "One of the worst WrestleManias of the modern era. Taker/HHH stands out as the best match of the event, while the rest of the event is forgettable. Rock as host was a good touch but it's very clear he was only there to advance his feud with Cena. Miz gets his time in the main event, but again, he was only there to advance the Rock/Cena feud. Cole/Lawler had no business being given all of that time. It was almost as if the WWE was desperate to put on a good event, and desperate they were. Unfortunately, their desperation was evident, and a lot of this event is a miss rather than a hit."

[3.0] "Besides being the grandest PPV WM in general is not really on top-level in my opinion. But this show was even a shame for WM. Taker vs HHH was great and the only actual good match. Punk vs Orton, Edge vs Del Rio and Cody vs Rey were just watchable. Even the main-event is yet acceptable. But the rest of the show is just a punch in the face."

[4.0] "Pros: - Edge vs Alberto Del Rio (match of the night and had to be the main event especially because it turned out that it was basically the farewell match of Edge); - The Undertaker vs Triple H; - Cody Rhodes vs Rey Mysterio; Cons: - very short 8-man tag team match and humiliation of The Corre; - Randy Orton buries CM Punk and The Nexus; - Michael Cole defeats Jerry Lawler; - very short 6-man mixed tag team match featuring Snooki; - The Miz vs John Cena (one of the worst main events in WrestleMania history); - Wasting The Rock as "the host" of this show until the end of it; In conclusion, WrestleMania XXVII was lame."

[3.0] "Meh WM. Tons of matches that I wanted to skip. Some matches that I did skip. There were two matches worth watching, the rest? No. CM Punk vs Randy Orton - [***3/4]. Cody Rhodes vs. Rey Mysterio - [***1/4]. Edge vs Alberto Del Rio - [**]. Miz vs John Cena - [*1/2]. Undertaker vs Triple H - [*]. Corre match - [NR]. Jerry Lawler vs Cole - [NR]. Snooki - [NR]"

[8.0] "A lot of people shit on this event and think it is no good, but I disagree with them. I think that it is good and there is a lot good about the event and I was never painfully bored. The only match I didn't like was Cole vs Lawler. The match was pretty boring but it was not all bad. I enjoyed the entrance when Jack Swagger was doing push ups and it just zooms in on his face as Stone Cold comes out. I also enjoyed the celebration of the match afterwards with the beer and the spinaroonies and all that. The match would've almost been worth it if Jerry Lawler actually got to keep the win and it wasn't reversed. Because of the length and the bad action, it's the worst match for me. The first three singles matches of the show were really good to me. 1. Edge vs Del RIo, 2. Orton vs Punk, and 3. Rhodes vs Mysterio in that order greatness. First being the best. They were all really good to me. the two multi-man matches were short so they didn't affect it plus I enjoyed different parts of each. For the eight man, knowing how much The Corre was a bother at the time, it was great to see them get their comeuppance. The mixed tag was good for maybe a few spots; Morrison hitting Starship Pain to the outside and Snooky's offense. For the main event, I'd compare it to Taker vs Kane at Mania 14, It was not the greatest in the world and it was not the worst in the world. It didn't hurt to sit through and there were some good parts. Undertaker vs Triple H was the match of the night and was an excellent match. Some other notes about the show were that it had an excellent theme song with "Written in the Stars" by Tinie Tempah. and for some of the segments, some of the Rock's could've been cut and I liked the Snoop Dogg segment until maybe Hornswoggle's part."