IInspiration

[2.0] "They're very funny and very entertaining. However, when the bell rings they're both atrocious. They're awkward, not athletic, and seem completely incapable of successfully performing a flat back bump. Entertaining characters can take careers to great heights but at some point at least one good match has to happen. They would be much better off as hype people for a better worker. Fans can spin it however they want and put the blame on opinions different from theirs but they're going to have to accept that not everyone is going to fawn over them."

[4.0] "These guys although entertaining, were horrible, horrible, horrible, hooorrriiibbllleee wrestlers. I think its fitting their tag rating is higher than any match they've been apart of. When they got released, I obviously felt bad, but was not surprised. They have never sniffed anything close to a decent match. BUT, they were very entertaining and played their part to a tee, which is usually all you need in New York. That bumped them from a 2 to a 4 for me. Did i mention they're horrible wrestlers?"

[9.0] "Talented best friends who put time and effort into their career, I can consider The IIconics as one of the best women's team in the history of WWE, charismatics, Mic skills, impeccable moveset, nice finishers. They fit each other, because Peyton Royce was amazing in the ring, good-seller and a bit worse on the mic, Billie Kay were worse in the ring (Not so good at selling aswell (prob because of the neck injury she suffered on NXT Takeover against Ember Moon back in 2016), top-notch on the mic. WWE gave them a very small tag championship reign.. just to give it to alexa and nikki, they for sure deserved more, their release were a fumble"

[7.0] "Individually, both girls are extremely mid at wrestling. You can even see my ratings for both on my profile. However, as a duo, they just... Get it. I won't rate them anything higher than a 7, because it's not like their matches were crazy good or anything (I mean for crying out loud, it was WWE tag team wrestling) However, they were so entertaining. Their brash, obnoxious Australian girls gimmick was so good, and the way they delivered in promos stood for both heat-seeking goldmine and just straight-up comedy."

[8.0] "A fun act. Both women complete each other very well. They lost a bit of their character from NXT to WWE main roster but made the most of what they had anyway. Not the most impressive in-ring ability but definitely good on their roles."

[6.0] "The IIconics were a real team in a Company in which it was difficult to be a female team, both before the creation of the titles and after. They were consistent and, above all, very funny. If their chemistry and in-ring skills were ridiculously bad, their comedic power and chemistry on the mic made them wickedly funny. They could have kept a place as managers or occasional commentators and still been entertaining. Too bad it had to end this way."

[7.0] "I really like the IIconics. There nothing to write home about in ring or anything. However they are endlessly funny and hilariously charismatic. There backstage segments always make me laugh and can take shitty material into something really funny. Wish they didn't spilt up though."

[8.0] "First off: They are obviously not the best in the ring, that much is clear. However, as characters they had a ton of chemistry and a good tag team move set. Both floundered without the other, showing how well they worked together. Peyton wasn't bad in the ring even, she had some great matches, so it wasn't like every match they had was awful. They should've gotten a 2nd run in 2020 as champs, but it wasn't meant to be sadly."

[3.0] "I really cannot stand IIconics at all, I don't get the appeal, I never understood what people see in them and I never liked them. It's fine if people like them, and good on them for getting over, but I just don't see it. They were very annoying and their "comedy" was obnoxious, and their wrestling was even worse. These two were so awful, I'm shocked people gave them passes. When these two showed up on the main roster and took up most of the screentime that the women wrestlers were dying to have, it was brutal to sit through. The fact Sasha Banks and Bayley lost their tag titles so quickly to them at WrestleMania is beyond me."

[4.0] "Never really liked them, pretty boring in the ring, annoying on the mic, some find them to be really funny I just didn't like their comedy"

[0.0] "Both women are mediocre talents. They both suck badly in the ring, and Billie Kay is definitely the worse worker out of the pair. Neither woman is particularly charismatic (although Billie Kay probably possess more than Peyton Royce here), and neither shouldn't talk on the mic at all since they both sound like screeching chimpanzees. I still have bad memories of their awful promos in WWE where they hurt our ears with their annoying voices because they're apparently getting "good" heat (even though it's obviously go-away heat). The IIconics are an awful tag team with a mediocre (and undeserving) tag title reign too. For the record, Billie is NOT funny at all. She's an incredibly obnoxious character where being annoying is her shitty gimmick. Peyton might be really hot, but she's still a mediocre talent with no good matches in her record too. Thankfully, I no longer have to see neither of these clowns on TV anymore. Please keep both of these hacks away from WWE and from AEW indefinitely."

[7.0] "The chemistry and promo skills of these two was unquestionable. The two naturally got heat without it feeling overly forced. They were passable in the ring but not on the level of some of the others in the talented locker rooms they shared."

[6.0] "While neither woman was ever all that great in-ring, they made up for that with their endless charisma and entertaining backstage segments. It was always a joy to see them show up on TV. I wish they had been given their own interview segment a la the KO Show or A Moment of Bliss because I think they could have really ran with that in WWE."

[8.0] "One of the Best female tag teams in the WWE with their over the top acting. One of the best gimmick in the modern era. Absolutely love them. Their Wrestling is decent but what sets them apart is their great gimmick, promos and character work both in ring and in promos."

[1.0] "Overrated as hell, hell yes, they look good and all but in the ring they are horrendous. The debut match in IMPACT against Decay was terrible and I honestly think they would really do much better as managers or something because since they debuted as a team they haven't improved at all and still look like a team made up of rookies."

[5.0] "They were an OK team but didn't really prove themselves on main roster. Hope they can reunite in Impact and show their potential."

[8.0] "We hardly knew ye. The IIconics were very entertaining together, reflected by Billie Kay and Peyton Royce having known each other since school and knowing how to play off each other. Their title win at WrestleMania 35 was their high point, but somehow Vince only saw Peyton as a star, so the team got broken up. Hope Billie finds her niche going forward."

[10.0] "The IIconics are fully packaged wrestlers, they're the most entertaining and funniest if not the only funny female wrestlers in WWE, it's very rare to have two enjoyable ladies with great chemistry together in these types of shows, and they're definitely talented but hopefully WWE gives them the chance to showcase their skills in the ring because they do have wrestling backgrounds before signing with WWE and they did have great matches in the past, and I hope we see the same performances or even better in WWE"

[9.0] "Putting Billie Kay and Peyton Royce together is one of the greatest things WWE ever have done. What they lack in ring they totally make up for by Amazing character work."

[6.0] "I really liked them in NXT, I thought there gimmick was pretty unique and neat. Since coming to the main roster i've just lost interest, I really have no reason to care about them on main and I don't know why or how but it doesn't seem like they have the same in-ring ability on the main roster. I haven't seen any decent matches from them since they came up. On the main roster they just bore me."

[10.0] "They are just the best, they should have been first WWE female tag team champions, they should be pushed to the moon in my opinion"

[8.0] "I think it's rather stupid to judge Billie and Peyton based on Laycool, Bella Twins, etc rather then by their own merit. They're passable in the ring and solid on the mic. They're awesome obnoxious heels and know how to get a rise out of the crowd. IF WWE ever adds a Women's Tag Team Championship The IIconics are my candidates to hold the title first."

[9.0] "Comparing the Iiconics to the Bella's is short sighted, and ignorant. The Bella's have the collective charisma of a boulder, with most of that being Nikki Bella busting her ass. The Iiconics are incr dibly charismatic, and know their characters well. They have amazing facial expressions, wrestle as a team, and have personalities that bounce off one another well."