# | Date | User | Rating | Comment |
1 | 30.06.2016 | ShooterMcShoot | 6.0 | Compared to last year's debacle, this was a Rumble that was booked well enough. It moved quickly and never had any dead spots. The issue I have is with the finish. You knew what was coming, but again, the finish they booked wasn't the one I wanted to see. So, in that regard, I wasn't happy, but in comparison to last year, like I said, it wasn't nearly the same shoddy disaster. |
2 | 25.01.2016 | CM Flosh 84 | "1) Roman Reigns (59 Minuten, 50 Sekunden) [1] " Das versteh ich nicht so ganz. Reigns war doch bei diesem Rumble, ca 15-20 Minuten backstage und demnach nicht im Ring. Ich würde deshalb eher Jericho auf Platz 1 setzen und die Zeit, die Reigns im backstage verbrachte von dessen In-Ring-Zeit abziehen. Dann reiht sich Reigns bei Ambrose ein, bzw davor =) |