DeutschEnglish
Not logged in or registered. | Log In | Register | Password lost?
Year:
Sort comments by:

Average rating based on the displayed comments: 5.53
DanTalksRasslin wrote on 30.07.2023:
[8.0] "In the ring Sullivan wasn't necessarily the smoothest technical wrestler in the world, but he was a solid brawler and that generally suited his character what he set out to accomplish in the ring. He was also a good talker and knew how to draw heat and get under the crowd's skin, and his implied-Satanic gimmick tapped into the Satanic-panic zeitgeist of the time, but in wrestling was ahead of its time, setting the stage for many of the classic dark/occult/cultish characters of the next several decades (accidental, but appropriate, that he ended up being my 666th wrestler rating). It should also be noted that it was no small feat for a 5'8" wrestler in the '70s and '80s to get over as anything other than enhancement talent - let alone to become an imposing heel - and Sullivan accomplished that. In the later part of his in-ring career he made the shift to more of a manager figure and his talking skill did well with that, even with a lot of silliness involved in the Dungeon of Doom stuff, while his work as a booker is somewhat more of a mixed bag. Overall an interesting, multifaceted career."
Mister Cute Face wrote on 02.07.2023:
[5.0] "I found him to be creepy when I was a kid. That faded really quickly. Looks like a goof, talks like a goof, and was involved in some of the most baffling angles ever. Some of his stuff was interesting, but the bad really sticks out."
Shoot Headbutt Lover wrote on 23.05.2023:
[5.0] "Damn this guy was a bad pro wrestler at least in-ring wise. He gassed out instantly and didn't have the best moves. His character work in the territories was sick as hell though, and the Dungeon of Doom stuff was funny in it's own way. He wasn't a good booker either, because that Benoit feud felt like it went on forever with no memorable story beats."
Giantfan1980 wrote on 23.05.2023:
[4.0] "Guy was built like a giant dwarf. Was very punchy kicky and by the mid 90's, that style was considered old fashion. Worked fine as a manger and a promo guy."
face painted legend wrote on 30.01.2023:
[7.0] "He was an undersized guy for his time. I believe Kevin was 5'8" or so, and 255 lbs soak and wet. However, as a wrestler, he had the ability to be so good at playing so many different character roles over the years in every facet whether it was the taskmaster, the games master, the devil, etc, , that the aura, the mystique, and all of that around him, along with style that he used in the ring made you feel sorry for the bigger guys that had to get in the ring to face him. He booked several different places, had some solid and some not so solid ideas, but I think he's best known for his WCW stint where he wrote the majority of the t.v. that beat WWE for 83 weeks in a row."
XXDoubleHHXX wrote on 22.11.2022:
[5.0] "Decent brawler that can definitely play an evil character, but as a booker he's terrible. The Dungeon of Doom storyline was obe of the worst and stupid factions he came up with. His early stuff with the sex cult thing is much better and should be remembered better than his WCW stuff."
Conquistador37 wrote on 07.09.2022:
[4.0] "Since my criteria is "how watchable are they"? The Taskmaster might not get much of a glowing review. I don't think I cared much for his ring work. He rarely seemed credible at his size, and more often than not had cronies or partners to help him get or keep an upper hand. The Army of Darkness is quite legendary and put the business on it's collective ear. And then kicked it for extra measure. I really liked The Varsity Club and every direction it took (booked perfectly from start to finish, excepting two incidents with Precious). His interviews sometimes went nowhere and took forever never getting there. I liked the whole Kevin Sullivan's butcher shop grouping, but I was a total Cactus Jack mark. Speaking of which, the best thing Sullivan ever did was constant, consistent favours for ol' Cacti; made growing up a wrestling fan more fun. The Alliance To End Hulkamania was duuuumb. The Dungeon of Doom was stuuuuupiiiid. The way he booked the nWo successfully MURDERED WCW. He drove out some of WCW's best talent at a time, which was a critical blow to them in never recovering any amount of success. Lotsa negatives here, fast forward moments piling up, heaps of groaning... uh oh... 4 points earned, mostly via The Varsity Club and the booking of Cactus Jack. also, that Boston accent is hilariously excessive."
kcharles520 wrote on 06.09.2022:
[9.0] "Sullivan deserves way more credit, he was a great old-school brawler and his feud with Benoit was one of the best in WCW during that time period. His Occult persona in the Florida scene was way ahead of its time and pre-dated alot of the edgier stuff fans would grow to love in the late '90s. You could tell he loved the wrestling business and gave his all to it. I just don't get the low rating here at all."
texasyosh wrote on 02.06.2022:
[6.0] "Kevin Sullivan is a pretty revolutionary guy in the business from a wrestling and booking standpoint."
cpatchj wrote on 30.03.2022:
[8.0] "Why is he this low? Kevin Sullivan had a long career in many different roles. He was a solid wrestler for most of it, and his heel work in Florida was revolutionary. Great character."
WhatIsLooveee wrote on 22.01.2022:
[6.0] "Lord of Darkness' gimmick with his own faction with Manson's Family vibe was a masterpiece. A charismatic talented performer who can make you believe his words who even in the sunset of an active career when he gone from his satanic gimmick and was a member of cartoony storylines, he performed at a quite adequate level most of time."
Marx Kane wrote on 24.05.2021:
[8.0] "Always liked the Satanic gimmick. A pretty good booker too. Small but had enough character to get him gigs in pretty much every promotion of the 20th century."
Viva La Raza wrote on 12.07.2019:
"He wasn't a good booker at all, even his wrestling skills aren't that good. I would give him two points, but I'm one of those people, who believe that he has something to do with the death of Benoit."
OldSchoolHeelFan wrote on 22.04.2019:
[10.0] "Frankly, I'm surprised that Sullivan's overall rating is quite low. From the time he was wrestling as a mid-card babyface back in the 70s to his unhinged heel gimmicks in the 80s and onwards, Kevin Sullivan was totally hardcore long before being hardcore was popular. Whether he was the Boston Battler, the Prince of Darkness, the Gamesmaster, or even the Taskmaster, Sully never failed to impress in the ring. As a kid, I was totally sold by his devil gimmick. In fact, Sully managed to intimidate me way more with his performances than the Undertaker ever did with his Dead Man gimmick. He won gold throughout both his babyface days and during his unhinged heel gimmick days. He had memorable kayfabe feuds with Dusty Rhodes, Blackjack Mulligan, Cactus Jack (after he split from Sully as a tag team duo), and the murderer who I will never acknowledge by name. Not to mention that Sully was unhinged enough to take on Abdullah The Butcher in a bloody steel cage match or even take on Bruiser Brody on numerous occasions. Sully was truly the epitome of old school wrestling and that was totally hardcore. Whenever I think of hardcore wrestlers, people like Cactus Jack, Abdullah The Butcher, Buzz Sawyer, and Kevin Sullivan come to mind."
JEK 1991 wrote on 14.10.2018:
[7.0] "I think he has excellent in-ring psychology and can perform very well in the ring. He has limited ring moves but he is a great entertainer. He can play the heel character very well. Sullivan's peak was in Florida in the 80's and being a member of the Army of Darkness. The Taskmaster gimmick in WCW was okay. I love his devil gimmick in the 80's best ever. Excellent at cutting promos Yes he effected Nancy his ex -fie Chris Benoit lives but shit happens. As a road agent and booker in WCW he was not that great. I am surprised that he is so low on this site. He is still wrestling at 69 years old and is not that great anymore."
Irishfbfan518 wrote on 03.06.2018:
[8.0] "Sullivan was a pretty good booker, along with a great character in WCW. He seemed to always change just enough to stay relevant, and as bad as the Dungeon of Doom was, he was really good in that role."
IsThisWrestling wrote on 08.04.2018:
[8.0] "Kevin Sullivan was one of the most underrated overrated wrestlers of all time, if that makes any sense. His demonic character ruled Florida to the point of overkill in the early-mid 80s, yet he never got the chance to portray in WCW tot the fullest extent that evil, Satanic character that made him famous. Instead you had the goofy Taskmaster. If Sullivan was allowed to be truly evil during that feud with Hogan, it surely would have been a lot more intense and worth remembering."
Owen wrote on 14.03.2017:
[8.0] "Kevin is a very good wrestler with a good grasp of ring psychology. He was so convincing that to this day many people believe that he is a satanist (He isn't). While much of his offense is brawling related, he has a good amount of scientific knowledge. He has been a wrestler, manager, and booker, and has run several stables over the years."
SpruseJohnson wrote on 11.02.2017:
[9.0] "You really want to see the best work Sullivan did, forget his WCW shit and find his work from Florida. This guy was years ahead of his time. Guys like Bray Wyatt are nothing but a cheap rip off of Sullivan. Don't believe me, watch and/or read how his work in Florida actually made many believe he was the devil and freaked out more than not."
jcb9 wrote on 20.10.2016:
[2.0] "A one-dimensional brawler in the ring. He could occasionally cut a good promo (like in his feud with Benoit) but more often than not his promos were just a much of mystical nonsense. And for all people say about how awful Vince Russo's WCW was, when they fired Russo and put Sullivan in charge, that was arguably even worse, with gimmicks like making Al Greene a dog and inexplicably reviving the Varsity Club 15 years too late."
Zed wrote on 20.06.2016:
[4.0] "Gut, der Dungeon of Doom war grottig. Dennoch hat er gewisses Kult Potential und ist in gewisserweiße mitverantwortlich für die nWo Storyline( Hogan trat gegen den DOD schon kurzzeitig in schwarz an, was die Idee zur nWo geben sollte). Als Booker hat Sullivan jedoch versagt, seine Ideen waren größtenteils Mist, WCW setzte sie dennoch um. Auch im Ring war der Taskmaster nicht wirklich gut, gilt jedoch nur für die Zeit im Dungeon, und danach, alles davor kann ich nicht bewerten, da ich nichts gesehen habe. Dennoch geb ich ihm eine 4, da man sich zwar an ihn und den Dungeon erinnert, jedoch wäre es keine Schande ihn zu vergessen."
horseman5 wrote on 28.05.2016:
[8.0] "One of the best I've heard on the mic. Worked like a big man, was a good brawler. Also the booker of WCW during the biggest boom ever."
The Sick Lebowski wrote on 27.05.2016:
[6.0] "Kleiner Giftzwerg mit Wiedererkennungswert. Im Ring jetzt nicht wirklich stark, aber zu gebrauchen, vor allem als Brawler. Gimmickmäßig teilweise (vor allem zu seiner Florida-Zeit) durchaus nett, teilweise (der Dungeon des Grauens) nicht wirklich toll."
Phenomenal91 wrote on 25.09.2014:
[7.0] "One of the strangest wrestlers in the business, and one with a surprising amount of longevity. He has a background in bodybuilding, but from the look of his body, you'd never guess it in a million years. He wasn't a technical giant or a scientific genius, but he could brawl like nobody else. An innovator of hardcore, a predecessor to the many other "supernatural" characters in wrestling, and a controversial figure behind the scenes of WCW. Quite a resume for just one man."
cortez666 wrote on 16.03.2014:
[6.0] "In Florida war er seiner Zeit als Heel recht weit vorraus. Er hat viele Aktionen gebracht die man vorher so noch nicht gesehen hat. Bei der WCW war er eine Katastrophe. Der erste Run 90/91 war noch ok, aber spätestens mit dem Tankmaster hat er alles verspielt. Dann noch das Dungeon of Doom und seine "Top" gebookten Matches, das zieht die Wertung ziemlich nach unten."
WrestleArts wrote on 08.12.2013:
[8.0] "Guter glaubwürdiger Worker mit gutem Micwork und großartiges Mind und Booker."
Henne wrote on 03.11.2013:
[6.0] "Guter Brawler, in den 80ern und auch in den 90ern noch gut dabei. Besser war er nur als Foto-Modell!"
Leone wrote on 27.11.2012:
[7.0] "Sullivan was very good on the Mic, and his evil gimmicks worked incredibly well, which is why he gets a 7. As a wrestler however, he was unremarkable, a brawler through and through, and at the same time, not an interesting one to watch."
brianpillman wrote on 17.03.2011:
[7.0] "Man darf ihn nicht nur auf seine WCW-Zeit reduzieren. In Florida damals ein richtig guter Mann, der vom Gimmick her seiner Zeit damals weit voraus war."
downtown2 wrote on 11.03.2011:
[5.0] "Sullivan ist zwar für fragwürdiges Booking verantwortlich, aber er war als Aktiver ein sehr glaubwürdiger Heel. Wrestlerisch eher etwas zu langsam und auch limitiert, konnte er dies aber durch absolute Glaubwürdigkeit seiner dargestellten Figur wieder wett machen. Ein großartiger Redner war er außerdem auch. Ich komme nicht umher ihm wenigstens fünf Punkte zu geben, die er verdient hat."
The-Game91 wrote on 25.02.2011:
[2.0] "Sehr gespaltene Meinungen über ihn aber der Kerl wiedert mich an. Er und Russo sind die schlimmsten überhaupt."
cradlerocker wrote on 03.12.2010:
[7.0] "Doch dramatisch unterbewertet hier. Klar kann man über die Endzeit in der WCW nicht viel gutes sagen, aber ganz ehrlich, bei wem kann man das schon? Bei der Gesamtbetrachtung bleibt am Ende ein guter Heel mit einer Hochphase in den 80ern sowie einem Hang zu obskuren und etwas mysteriösen Gimmicks bzw. Stables, die gerne mal in Richtung Trash abdrifteten."
Eazye wrote on 13.06.2010:
[6.0] "Als Booker grottig, keine Frage. Aber als er sich in den 80ern in den Ring traute, war er DER Heel. Zog verdammt viel im Vergleich zu einigen heutigen Heels. Auch als Wrestler nicht schlecht für seine Massen. Für 6 Punkte reicht es"
Manu Adams wrote on 06.04.2010:
[7.0] "Kann mich Dr Gonzo nur anschließen, war mitte der 80iger in Florida der meistgehasste Heel im Business, selbst Roddy Piper oder Bobby Heenan waren nicht so over wie Sullivan. Dennoch gibt es einige Abzugspunkte was sein Booking in der WCW 2000 angeht und vorallem seine Zeit als Taskmaster bei den Dungeon of Doom. Aber die Army of Darkness Zeit hat gerockt."
Eddie wrote on 15.03.2010:
[7.0] "Genialer Heel in der WCW, aber die hatten so viel gute, dass er doch nur in der Midcard landete, auch wegen seiner Statur natürlich nie zu was größerem Berufen. Matches gegen Benoit waren aber immer sehenswert, 7 Punkte."
teekay86 wrote on 05.09.2009:
[0.0] "Weder Russo noch Hogan & Co. waren in meinen Augen der (Haupt-)Grund für den Untergang der WCW. Der Taskmaster hat schon bevor Russo einen Fuß in die Liga gesetzt hat alles dafür getan den Karren vor die Wand zu fahren."
108 Sterne wrote on 24.07.2009:
[4.0] "Hmh... der Mann mag gute Zeiten gehabt haben, aber meine frühesten Erinnerungen an ihn sind aus den 90igern. Da war er ein ziemlich farbloser Heel mit unspektakulären Kämpfen; der Versuch in mit seinem Dungeon of Doom etwas Farbe zu verleihen funktionierte leider nicht."
Marcy wrote on 23.06.2009:
[6.0] "Der Taskmaster war rein vom Entertainment her ein guter Heel. Im Ring wirkte er irgendwie limitiert und sein Look war ja nu auch nicht gerade für den Main Event geeignet. Was er als Booker gebracht hat, muss man hier wohl nicht mehr erwähnen."
Sabu316 wrote on 10.10.2008:
[7.0] "Als Heel ist der Mann richtig gut gewesen. Schade das es so wenig Leuter erkennen. Über seine Leistung als Booker kann man das leider nicht ganz so sagen. Die war meistens weniger gut, auch wenn er zum Ende der WCW nicht immer etwas dafür konnte."
Dr Gonzo wrote on 21.08.2008:
[10.0] "Schade, dass viele User hier Sullivan pauschal abstrafen ohne seine Karriere wirklich zu kennen. Mit seinem "Devil"-Gimmick war er während der 80er Jahre einer der besten Heels des Geschäfts und seiner Zeit weit voraus! Seine Matches mit Dusty Rhodes in Florida waren brutale Schlachten & absolut sehenswert! Was seine Rolle als Booker betrifft, so wird häufig vergessen, dass er auch während der heißen Phase der wCw verantwortlich war und die enorme Heat für die nwo gebookt hat (Nash & Hall betonen das immer wieder). Dass er später viel Mist gebaut hat lag auch an den personellen Problemen der wCw."
LordTrailer wrote on 17.07.2008:
[3.0] "Er war kein schlechter Heel, aber was er als Booker insbesondere mit dem Dungeon of Doom verzapft hat fand ich damals schon grausam. Das hat mir sein Lebenswerk sehr verleidet."
theflo438 wrote on 25.06.2008:
[0.0] "Ein verdammt schlechter Booker, den ich als Mitverantwortlichen für den Untergang der WCW sehe."
jimpanse1980 wrote on 17.03.2008:
[2.0] "Als Mensch, Booker und Wrestler eine absolute Fehlbesetzung. Hat sich in der WCW immer selber gepusht, Benoit unten gehalten, weil seine Frau dann ihn wollte und die Matches, die er gebookt hat, waren teilweise nur noch schlimm - Ich sage nur Dungeon of Doom. Das war schon kein Trash mehr, das war Mist."
LexLuger4ever wrote on 24.02.2008:
[6.0] "Der Taskmaster - ich konnte und kann ihn zwar nicht gerade als einen meiner Lieblingswrestler bezeichnen, aber er gab einen guten Heel ab und hatte ein paar gute Jahre in der WCW!"
Stani wrote on 22.02.2008:
[2.0] "Als Anführer des Legion of Doom, als Headbooker der WCW oder Solo einfach unerträglich. Die perfekte Verkörperung von negativem Trash"
Blade Bourdeaux wrote on 31.01.2008:
[4.0] "Er hat sich selbst einen Bärendienst erwiesen durch sein Dungeon Gimmick. Dafür wird er in Erinnerung bleiben."
Scotty 2 Hotty wrote on 31.08.2007:
[2.0] "Kein guter Wrestler, sowie Booker. Konnte mich nie überzeugen."
shannonmoore wrote on 07.08.2007:
[0.0] "Russo war schlimm ? Sullivan hat da noch weit mehr Fantasie:)"
ShaneO wrote on 29.06.2007:
[0.0] "Im Ring grottig - seine Versuche als Booker ebenfalls - also, die Null muss stehen."
jupp365 wrote on 24.06.2007:
[4.0] "Die Matches gegen Benoit waren genial. Lag aber wahrscheinlich eher an Benoit. Sein Dungeon of Doom Stable hingegen war absoluter Mist. Und sich selbst als Booker in den Main-Event oder kurz davor booken ist auch nicht wirklich löblich!"
timbo7111 wrote on 24.06.2007:
[2.0] "Im Ring nicht mal mittelmäßig und denkwürdig schlechte Storylines als Booker gehen auf seine Kappe. Daher: 5!"
jolliet wrote on 24.06.2007:
[10.0] "In seiner WCW-Zeit ein absolut überzeugender Heel. Seine Tag Team Matches mit Cactus jack gegen die Nasty Boys waren der Knaller und sind immer noch Spitze"